Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Aim Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges council to reject AIM master plan population projection as overly optimistic
Summary
Dan Munson of Ward 6 told council he believes the AIM master plan's population projection for Norman is inflated; he cited what he said were discrepancies between the plan's numbers and recent population counts and urged council not to adopt the plan in its present form.
During the miscellaneous comments period at the end of the meeting, Dan Munson of Ward 6 addressed the council with concerns about population projections in the city's AIM master plan. Munson told council the plan's growth estimates are substantially higher than recent historic growth and that adopting overly optimistic projections could lead to excessive infrastructure commitments.
What Munson said: Munson said Norman has been growing by about 500–600 people per year and that the AIM master plan projects growth of more than 2,700 people annually. He criticized a large discrepancy between the plan's stated current population and what he considered a more accurate number: "It says that the population today in Norman, Oklahoma is 137,920. It's not it's 131,000. How can How could we be off almost 7,000 people on the year that this is getting published? That is a major, major concern," Munson said. He also referenced differing housing forecast figures in the plan's supporting studies and urged council not to move forward with the plan "in its current form."
Why it matters: Population projections underpin long-range plans for infrastructure, utilities, roads and housing. Munson told council an inflated projection could drive unnecessary development, strain priorities and expand into green space, while understating the risks of overbuilding.
Council response: Under the Open Meetings Act the council did not engage in discussion during miscellaneous comments and there was no formal council action recorded in response to the remarks. The meeting adjourned after public comment.
Ending: Munson's remarks were part of the public record and will be included with the meeting minutes; any formal council action on the AIM master plan would occur in a future agenda item with staff presentations and public hearings if scheduled.
