Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Conflict Resolution topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mediator presents draft protocol for resolving board member misconduct and conflicts

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A professional mediator and a school-district presenter outlined a stepwise protocol for board members to use when a trustee witnesses alleged misconduct by another member; the proposal emphasizes initial direct conversation, escalation procedures and third‑party mediation.

A local mediator and retired educator presented a proposed protocol on April 15 for addressing alleged board-member misconduct and internal conflict among trustees. The presenters said the document is designed to help trustees de-escalate disputes and preserve working relationships so the board can function effectively.

The proposed protocol sets a stepped approach: step 1 encourages the witnessing board member to meet with the colleague individually to attempt a resolution through direct, respectful discussion; step 2 proposes involving a neutral party such as a trained mediator if the issue cannot be resolved informally; and step 3 contemplates formal documentation and reporting procedures if conflicts persist. Presenters described the “third story” technique — having disputing parties describe each other’s perspective to find common ground — and urged an early, face-to-face conversation before public escalation.

Both presenters emphasized that the protocol is voluntary and intended to complement formal rules of order and legal obligations; it is not a substitute for formal disciplinary mechanisms or any statutory processes that apply to public bodies. One public speaker and multiple trustees praised the idea; other commenters urged the board adopt stronger accountability and public-facing remedies for repeated problems.

No formal board vote was taken on the proposal; trustees thanked the presenters and suggested that the draft be shared with the board for future consideration and potential placement on an upcoming agenda for formal action.