Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters urge transparency on meetings, express concerns about charters, attendance and new gun law
Summary
During the limited public forum, multiple residents addressed open-meeting rights, charter school impacts, a student's repeated tardies due to appointments, student proficiency concerns and the state's repeal of gun-free school zones.
Several community members addressed the Natrona County School District Board of Trustees during the limited public forum on matters ranging from open-meeting law to charter schools, attendance records and a recently passed state gun law.
Leslie Hall Huss of Casper told the board that statements by Chair Kristofferson at a prior meeting suggesting the board controls whether meetings are public conflicted with the Wyoming Open Meetings Act, citing Title 16, Chapter 4, Section 403 of state law and emphasizing the public’s right to address elected officials. Huss also referenced a 2022 U.S. District Court decision in Sheridan County that she said supported public-comment protections.
Multiple speakers raised other concerns. Joe Morales urged the board to take a public stance on charter schools despite their primary governance being at the state level; Morales said local charter schools in Casper serve wealthier families and have financial ties to a large for-profit management company. Jennifer Cruz described repeated tardies on her grandson’s record resulting from medical appointments and requested the district consider amending attendance policies to distinguish short appointments from tardies; district staff said they would follow up with her.
Melissa Behringer, a Casper parent, spoke about statewide legislation sometimes called the Repeal Gun Free Zones Act and warned that removing local control to keep schools gun-free could change school culture and complicate parent-teacher interactions. She cited the 2017 Wyoming School Safety and Security Act as prior law that allowed local discretion.
Other public commenters urged attention to proficiency gaps in student performance and thanked district staff for programs that engage students in extracurricular activities.
Chair Kristofferson later clarified that meetings are public except for executive sessions and said the board welcomes public comment. District staff told one commenter they would follow up on the attendance question.
