Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Permit Compliance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Code enforcement records compliance on driveway and dumpster permit cases; administrative fees assessed

2997146 · April 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two status hearings found property owners had obtained required permits: McNulty (driveway permit) and 1008 Airport Road LLC (dumpster enclosure permit). The magistrate found both properties in compliance and assessed administrative costs ($330 and $329 respectively) but did not impose fines.

At a special magistrate hearing for the City of St. Pete Beach, the magistrate found two separate code enforcement matters in compliance after the respondents obtained the required permits and assessed administrative costs.

Steve Rivera, City of St. Pete Beach code enforcement, reported that the respondents in case 20240089 (Patrick Thomas McNulty and Annette Weiss McNulty) had secured the required driveway permit. Rivera told the magistrate the city would not seek fines but requested $330 in administrative costs. The magistrate found the property in compliance and ordered assessment of the administrative costs.

In a separate matter, code enforcement reported that 1008 Airport Road LLC had obtained a dumpster enclosure permit and was in compliance; the city requested $329 in administrative costs and no fines. The magistrate found that property in compliance and assessed the $329 administrative fee. In both matters the magistrate said she would monitor compliance with the permit timelines established by the building department and noted staff could return the case to the magistrate if permit inspections or compliance terms were not met.

Ending: Both properties were found in compliance; the magistrate ordered payment of administrative costs and left open the city’s ability to return the matters to enforcement if permit terms are not followed.