Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Service Area Expansion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs urban service area expansion for 1620 South Dover Road amid resident opposition
Summary
The Hillsborough County Planning Commission on April 14 recommended approval of a privately initiated plan amendment to expand the urban service boundary to include 31.83 acres at 1620 South Dover Road and to re-designate the site from Residential 1 to Residential 4.
Get email alerts on the Urban Service Area Expansion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hillsborough County Planning Commission on April 14 recommended approval of a privately initiated proposal to expand the county's urban service area to include about 31.83 acres at 1620 South Dover Road and to re-designate the site from Residential 1 to Residential 4.
Planning commission staff presented HCCPA 24-33 (text amendment) and its companion map amendment HCCPA 24-34, saying the application meets criteria for urban expansion under the county's comprehensive plan, including adjacency to the existing urban boundary and the availability of public utilities in the immediate area. Planner Jillian Massey briefed commissioners on the site's location, the required public-utility connection if approved and that agency reviewers had raised no objections in the staff packet.
The applicant, represented by Cammie Corbett (Hill Ward & Henderson) and consultant Isabel Albert, told the commission the site is contiguous on three sides to the urban service area, that their submitted materials document infrastructure and community amenities that support expansion and that a later rezoning and plan development application will address layout, stormwater and other site-level details.
Residents who live near the site urged the commission to reject the changes, citing flooding, wetlands, traffic and loss of rural character. Penny Martin told commissioners she and other neighbors live on five- to 10-acre lots, that the area is intended for long-term agricultural and large-lot residential use and that the amendment would be inconsistent with multiple policies in the comprehensive and community plans. Other speakers โ including David Butler, Brady Harris, Yvette Nieman, George Nieman and Angela Johnson โ warned of potential drainage and traffic impacts and pressed for lower densities (one to two units per acre rather than four).
Commissioners questioned staff and the applicant about surrounding densities and utility capacity. Commissioner Cardenas asked staff about lot sizes in the neighboring developments; Massey said some nearby lots averaged under an acre, noting a mix of rural and suburban patterns along South Dover Road. County staff said they reviewed public comments and technical materials and that policy interpretation can vary; staff relied principally on the seven criteria for urban service area expansion when finding consistency.
After discussion, Commissioner Kona moved to find HCCPA 24-33 consistent with the comprehensive plan; Commissioner Bowden seconded. The commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the text amendment. Commissioners then voted unanimously to recommend approval of the map amendment HCCPA 24-34.
What happens next
The Planning Commission's recommendation goes to the Board of County Commissioners for final action. If the board approves the urban service area expansion and map amendment, a future rezoning/plan development application will be the venue for more detailed site design, stormwater and infrastructure mitigation measures described by the applicant's presentation.
Votes at the meeting
HCCPA 24-33 (text amendment) โ Motion to find consistent moved by Commissioner Kona, seconded by Commissioner Bowden; motion carried unanimously.
HCCPA 24-34 (map amendment) โ Motion to find consistent moved by Commissioner Kona, seconded by Commissioner Bowden; motion carried unanimously.
Ending
Commissioners expressed sympathy for neighbors' concerns about traffic and flooding while noting their review is limited to consistency with the county comprehensive plan. Both consistency findings were taken after staff recommended the proposals met the expansion criteria; further technical and site-specific review will occur at the rezoning and plan development stage.

