Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Air Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident raises concerns about lines in sky; city staff says airspace not under city control
Summary
A member of the public asked whether Arlington has a policy on suspected aerial spraying and changing sky conditions. City staff responded that municipalities do not control airspace and suggested contacting regional air-quality agencies. The commenter cited worries about air quality, solar-panel performance and local vegetation.
Get email alerts on the Public Health Air Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A resident urged the council to look into changes in daytime sky appearance and possible aerial activity, saying the altered skies worry residents and could affect air quality and solar-panel output. City staff replied that cities do not control airspace and suggested regional air-quality agencies as the appropriate contacts.
Dawn Scarcello, who identified herself as living in unincorporated areas but spending time in Arlington and working in Arlington, told the council she had been "looking into something" and that many people she spoke with were concerned about "the stuff that's going on in the skies." Scarcello said the sky used to be blue and that at about "3PM or ish" the sky would grow hazy with lines left by planes; she referred to terms she had seen such as "chemtrails" and "cloud seeding" and said she believed the phenomenon was making the sky "kind of a pale white." She also said, "I think it affects our air quality" and suggested the council look into the issue.
A city staff member responded that municipalities do not control airspace and that if the concern is pollution-related, "Puget Sound Clean Air, Department of Ecology would be ones to start with." The transcript records no further staff action or formal direction to investigate; the exchange occurred during the public-comment portion of the meeting.
The transcript contains no data, sampling or analysis to support or refute the claim that aerial activity described by the commenter is changing local air quality or solar-panel performance. Staff guidance in the meeting was limited to directing residents to regional air-quality authorities.

