Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Composting Organics Diversion topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Norwalk committee hears composting options as residents, experts press for school and community programs

2988339 · January 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Norwalk City ad hoc Incident Resilience Committee heard a presentation on composting and organics diversion from a regional operator and received public comments urging stronger community engagement, school integration and return of finished compost to residents.

The Norwalk City Ad Hoc Incident Resilience Committee on an evening meeting heard a presentation about municipal and community-scale composting and organics diversion and received public comments urging the city to involve residents and schools in any sustainability rollout.

The discussion focused on how composting can reduce landfill and incinerator use, site and permitting constraints for local operations, and recent state regulatory changes affecting large commercial generators. No formal policy or contract was adopted; council members and members of the public agreed to follow up with staff and outside presenters for more information.

Tim (presenter), identified as a composting operator who works with Bridgeport and Stratford, explained the basic process and benefits of managed aerobic composting, saying, "If a pile is kept aerobic properly, there will be no smell. It smells like dirt." He described the four components of a compost pile (carbon, nitrogen, water and air), described mechanical mixing used at his operation and said properly managed hot piles reduce pests and destroy seeds and pathogens. He also cited regional examples and business models: a small Park City-style community operation at Captain's Cove that processes about 24 tons a year and weekly household collections in BlackRock.

Diane Loracella, who identified herself as a member of the Norwalk Zero Waste Coalition, urged the committee to "reach out to its citizens that care about this topic in a meaningful way, not just for a 3 minute discussion," and proposed that contracts with haulers include returning some finished compost to residents: "it would be very good if the public, who pays for the transport of food scraps and leaves, to get back at least one bucket load or bag of rich soil." Alex Muniz, a Mallard Road resident, asked whether a planned sustainability director or a different team would handle composting and whether schools would be involved. Kelly Humiston, a Wolfpit Avenue resident, said she supports the mayor’s goal to be "the greenest city in Connecticut" and asked how the city will handle commercial and residential programs.

Committee members asked operational questions. Council member Najoski Agnew asked about scale and siting: "Can you talk a little bit about the size of your current operation?" Tim said the Captain's Cove site occupies about the equivalent of eight parking spaces on a paved surface, uses a tractor and concrete block push walls, and processes roughly 24 tons a year while serving more than 100 household participants in one neighborhood.

Tim described practical constraints that Norwalk will need to consider: a preference for hard-surfaced sites to operate tractors, capital and insurance costs, DEEP (Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection) setback rules he described as a 200-foot requirement from residences for some compost facilities, and challenges finding low-toxicity parcels in urban areas. He said scale reduces per-ton labor costs and mentioned higher-capital engineered options (in-vessel systems, forced-air facilities) being built elsewhere.

On regulation and enforcement, Tim said the state recently changed rules that eliminate an older 20-mile proximity limit for composting operations and that large generators (he referenced a 26-ton reporting threshold discussed in the meeting) will be required to self-report and identify where they send organics; he said the state plans a website to support that reporting. He cautioned that enforcement capacity at the state level is limited and that implementation will take time.

Tim and committee members reviewed local economics and markets: recent regional tipping fees cited in the presentation included approximately $88 per ton for trash to incinerators and about $70 per ton quoted for deliveries to an out-of-area biodigester; leaves and wood chip tipping fees were described in a range of about $25–$45 per ton. Tim noted revenue options such as tipping fees for organics and sales of finished compost but warned that hauling distances and market demand affect cost-effectiveness.

No vote or approval of a local composting program occurred. The committee accepted minutes from the prior meeting (motion recorded during the opening agenda item) and adjourned at the end of the session. Chair Johan Lopez invited commenters and presenters to follow up by email and asked staff to provide an articulated response about sustainability plans and next steps.

The next steps recorded in the meeting were follow-up: Tim offered to share site-planning materials and operational details with Norwalk staff, Diane asked the committee to contact the Norwalk Zero Waste Coalition for citizen input, and Chair Johan Lopez asked the public to email him for more information on the city’s sustainability work.