Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Joliet council hears hours of objections over Prairie Landing subdivision; engineering team offers interim flood fixes
Loading...
Summary
Residents of Piccadilly, Warwick and nearby subdivisions pressed the City Council on stormwater, tree preservation and traffic ahead of a planned vote on the Prairie Landing preliminary plat; developer and engineer said a temporary pipe and detention design would reduce some flooding while full relief depends on upstream development.
The City of Joliet City Council heard more than two hours of public comment and technical testimony Monday about the proposed Prairie Landing subdivision, a single‑family housing development on an annexed farm field east of Essington Road.
Residents urged the council to delay action, saying the project would worsen flooding, remove long‑standing tree buffers and increase traffic; the developer’s attorney and the project engineer replied that the plan complies with R‑2 zoning and that stormwater measures being proposed would reduce short‑term flooding risks though they would not fully fix an upstream drainage problem.
The attorney for the project, Steve Bauer, identified himself as “attorney and entitlement manager with D.R. Horton Midwest” and told the council his team had secured temporary and permanent easements on nearby park property to allow off‑site storm infrastructure to be installed. Bauer summarized landscaping and tree work and said, “there will be a total of 30 trees preserved, a total of 603 trees added, plus an additional 1,080 shrubs for a total of 1,759 total new plantings.”
Design engineer David Reando of Manhart Consulting answered residents’ technical questions and described an interim storm sewer strategy the developer intends to construct immediately: a large trunk line and detention basin within the Prairie Landing site sized to carry runoff up to the 10‑year design storm. “We designed our storm sewer system low enough to catch that drain tile,” Reando said, adding that “we are accepting everything that’s coming at us,” meaning the development will receive upstream flows rather than block them.
Reando and Bauer repeatedly told the council that full relief for the neighborhood’s chronic flooding depends on future development and a detention pond on the larger unincorporated farm field upstream (the parcel residents referred to as the “Heron” property). Reando said that when that upstream property is developed with a detention pond and held to lower release rates, flows into the subdivisions would fall significantly; until then, the developer’s interim system will reduce but not eliminate overland flooding on very large storms.
Residents pressed on several points: whether the new subdivision would connect to Gulfview Drive (staff and counsel said the southern 20 feet of that right‑of‑way was vacated and ownership transferred, and no connection is planned), the sufficiency of notification to nearby households, whether lot density matched surrounding neighborhoods (city staff said proposed lot sizes meet the R‑2 minimum of about 7,500 square feet), and how school‑district capacity would be affected (the developer said Plainfield School District provided a letter saying it can accommodate the project’s anticipated student generation).
Several homeowners asked for a continuance to review final engineering plans; Bauer and the engineer said detailed plans were on file and that Reando would remain after the meeting to meet with residents who wanted to review them.
The council did not take a final vote on Prairie Landing during the pre‑council session. Multiple presenters said the item was scheduled for council consideration the next day. Residents and council members said they expect further technical review by city engineering staff before any building permits are issued.
Why it matters: The project would convert an open farm field annexed to Joliet decades ago into 20 single‑family lots under an R‑2 zoning approach the developer says conforms to city code. For neighbors who have experienced recurring basement and yard flooding, the matter raises questions about whether interim fixes and required city inspections will be enough until the larger upstream drainage area is developed and a major detention pond can be built.
Local context and next steps: The developer and engineer said they will be available after Monday’s meeting for residents to review engineering plans; city staff and the council indicated any final land‑disturbance permits and grading must meet city stormwater standards and be inspected before homes are built.
