Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Assessment Tool topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission trials parks-assessment tool; members flag dumping, invasives and dog-waste problems
Summary
St. Helens Parks & Trails commissioners piloted a parks-assessment tool and used the first compiled report to highlight dumping, invasive plants and frequent off‑leash dogs in multiple parks.
St. Helens Parks & Trails commissioners reviewed a new parks-assessment tool designed to standardize monthly reports on safety, amenities, vegetation and volunteer hours, and used the first compiled round to flag maintenance and safety concerns across multiple parks.
The consolidated report — compiled from forms submitted by commission members — documented yard debris and metal dumping at Graycliffs, blackberry and English ivy infestations at the Botanical Gardens and Graycliffs, construction-related invasive plants at Columbia View Waterfront, moss on Campbell Park ball fields, and recurring off‑leash dog use and dog waste at Sixth Street and other locations. Commissioners discussed using the tool to record photographic evidence and to guide staff follow-up, and asked staff to review whether the information could be accepted as part of the standard packet materials.
Commissioners also discussed logistics for volunteer cleanups. One volunteer-led weed‑eating and a follow-up cleanup at the Botanical Gardens were discussed: a proposed weed‑eating date of May 10 and a park cleanup on June 14 were mentioned in the meeting, with the organizer asking for a gap of weeks between activities to allow herbicide or weed treatment to take effect. The commission agreed the form should be available in both PDF/Word formats and as printed copies for commissioners without printers. Several commissioners recommended converting the form into a fillable online form (Google Docs or similar) to streamline data entry and allow immediate photo-based submissions.
Commissioners said the compiled sheet should go to Parks staff (referred to in the meeting as Buck and Ginny Dimcho) before the packet deadline so it can be included in the meeting packet. The chair requested Buck’s feedback on whether the format would be useful to operations staff.
Members also noted that data from the tool could be broadened in future to cover sidewalks, trails and grounds around municipal buildings because the municipal code gives the commission a wider remit than parks alone. The pilot will continue for at least one more monthly cycle so more commissioners can test the form and staff can provide feedback.
The commission did not take a formal vote on the tool itself during this meeting; direction was limited to refining the form, converting formats, and sending compiled reports to staff before packet deadlines.
