Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Vermont committee debates enforcement options for H.342 privacy bill
Summary
Lawmakers, witnesses and agency staff debated how H.342 would be enforced if passed, weighing injunctive relief and private suits against fines, a state-administered notice form and a study of public-agency compliance.
Members of the Vermont Economic Development committee continued a multi-hour discussion on H.342 on March 25, focused on how the bill would be enforced if it becomes law.
The committee heard from Chief Superior Judge Tom Zona, who described how the bill’s current enforcement language — draft 1.3 — would rely on traditional civil remedies and the courts. "The current enforcement mechanism that draft 1.3... provides for damages as well as injunctive relief," Zona said, noting injunctive relief could trigger temporary restraining orders and multiple hearings. "A temporary restraining order is issued before there's a notice and opportunity for the party...to be able to respond," he said, describing Rule 65 standards and the need to show "immediate and irreparable injury" for emergency relief.
The judge told the committee he could not predict how many suits the statute would generate, but cautioned that private litigation could strain…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

