Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Food Safety Inspections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds Happy Garden permit revocation but allows conditional path to reopening
Summary
After multiple inspections that found repeated critical violations, the Mason County Board of Health upheld a February revocation of Happy Garden's food-service permit but set conditions under which the restaurant may reopen earlier than the six-month revocation period.
The Mason County Board of Health reviewed an appeal by Happy Garden restaurant after county environmental-health inspectors revoked the restaurant’s food-service permit in February following multiple inspections and closures for repeated critical violations.
County environmental-health staff presented inspection findings and said the facility had been closed three times in six months for critical violations commonly associated with foodborne illness. Staff said the operator had not completed the required certified food-protection-manager course and that some food preparation occurred in a detached rear shed without handwashing facilities, a condition inspectors said posed a public-health risk.
Happy Garden’s owner (interpreted) said the business has operated similarly for years and that limited space made some inspector requests difficult to meet; the owner said they recently purchased the restaurant and did not have resources for a full renovation (an estimated $12,120,000 in the owner’s presentation). The owner said they have scheduled the certified food-protection-manager exam and planned to move some preparation to the front of the facility and to close the dine-in area to allow more space for compliant prep.
Board members discussed options. Environmental-health staff noted that some corrective steps would require city building and planning review and could lengthen the timeline. Staff offered to work directly with the owners on a written checklist of required corrections and to coordinate inspections.
The board voted to uphold the revocation but established an alternative path to reopening: the owners must (1) complete and pass the certified food protection manager course, (2) prepare the facility so on-site operations meet code (including moving food-preparation activities to an inspected front area or otherwise meet requirements), and (3) receive a positive reinspection and written recommendation from county environmental-health staff before the board will consider reopening. The board’s action leaves the formal six-month revocation period in place but permits reopening earlier if staff confirm compliance and recommend reopening to the board.
The board directed staff to provide the owner with a written outline of required corrections and to coordinate with city building officials where work would trigger permits.
