Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Strategic Coherence Goal Setting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fulton City School District spotlights student goal‑setting and attendance as part of strategic coherence plan

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board heard student-led presentations and a year‑one update on the district’s five‑year Strategic Coherence Plan, with staff reporting a district chronic absenteeism rate of 30.7% and school leaders describing classroom goal‑setting tied to attendance, academics and social‑emotional growth.

The Fulton City School District Board of Education heard a year‑one update on the district’s five‑year Strategic Coherence Plan and a series of student presentations focused on goal setting, attendance and academic targets.

The presentation, led by district staff and building principals, framed goal setting as the central outcome for year one of the five‑year plan and stressed classroom systems meant to support student ownership of goals. District presenters said the plan centers three interlocking priorities — student learning/wellness/life pathways, systems and structures, and culture — and that year one emphasized creating a goal‑setting culture across all six buildings.

Why it matters: Board members and staff said goal setting is intended to increase student motivation, attendance and academic outcomes. The district flagged chronic absenteeism — students missing 20% or more of days — as a major area for follow‑up and said a deeper report on absenteeism will be scheduled at a future meeting.

District staff presented attendance and behavior data alongside samples of classroom goal‑setting practice. Staff reported a chronic absenteeism rate of 30.7 percent districtwide, noting that roughly a third of students currently fall into the intensive intervention tier. Principals and teachers described steps taken in classrooms, including five‑week check‑ins, visual trackers for younger students and student reflection cycles for older students.

Students from multiple buildings explained how goal setting changed what they do in class. “By goal setting this year, I found that it has increased my responsibility in a positive way. It has given me a sense of pride in myself,” said Karina Clements, a sixth grader who spoke during the presentations. At the junior high, Principal Eric Hrabowski described a routine of writing goals in September, checking progress every five weeks and adjusting at 20‑week marks.

High school Principal Nate Murray told the board that students who set personally meaningful goals are more likely to follow through: “The goal has to be meaningful for them,” he said, explaining why the high school shifted some goal work from prescribed academic trackers toward student‑chosen targets.

Board and staff discussion touched on reliability of student self‑reported trackers, how objective school tools (attendance data and assessment results) are shared with students, and how school teams use referral data in problem‑solving. Staff said referral records are being used as data rather than only as consequences, so the district can identify patterns and plan interventions.

Staff also summarized assessment trends the board requested: kindergarten screening and mid‑year diagnostic data show gains between the beginning and middle of the school year, and district leaders said elementary and secondary proficiency rates are generally improving year over year though gaps remain compared with national benchmarks for incoming kindergarten students.

Ending: District leaders said year two will focus on planning for achievement — backward unit‑planning, tighter progress‑monitoring and scheduled goal‑review weeks — and committed to presenting a separate, more detailed report on chronic absenteeism at a future board meeting.