Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Station 833 6th topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Controversial plan to replace South Shore Community Center with new Fire Station at 833 Sixth Street continued after board expresses design and siting concerns
Summary
The Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board continued the application to replace the South Shore Community Center with a new Fire Station at 833 Sixth Street after extensive public comment and board concerns about scale, ramps and demolition of a Morris Lapidus-era facility.
A plan to demolish the South Shore Community Center and build a new Fire Station at 833 Sixth Street dominated the Historic Preservation Board’s afternoon session, drawing sustained public comment, technical questions and concerns about scale, preservation and neighborhood impacts.
City staff and the project team presented a three-story, resiliency-focused fire station to replace the aging Fire Station No. 1 operations currently on Eleventh Street. The proposal — sited on city-owned land where the South Shore Community Center now sits — includes apparatus bays, living quarters, a lower-level garage with 27 employee spaces and 14 retained public parking spaces. The design team said the new facility was elevated to meet flood-resilience requirements and was sized to meet modern fire-service standards; the team also said it had incorporated elements and textures from the existing Lapidus-era building, including stacked-bond planters and canopy forms.
Opponents — including neighborhood leaders, preservation advocates and residents of adjacent buildings — objected to demolition of the Lapidus-era center, disruption to daycare and senior programs, noise and glare from fire apparatus backing and egress, and the width of ramp and curb-cut elements. Preservation advocates argued the center has social and architectural significance; they asked the board staff and commissioners to pursue alternatives or mitigate impacts. The project team and City CIP officials said the city has evaluated multiple sites over several years, that the existing station is deficient, and that siting constraints left few feasible alternatives that meet response-time and programmatic requirements.
Board action: after extended discussion the board voted to continue the matter to the January 11 meeting to allow the applicant time to address specific board design concerns (notably ramping, visual buffering, and integration of historic fabric) and provide additional technical responses. The commission had previously approved the development-regulation waivers needed for a government-use project; the board’s COA hearing continues to review design compatibility in the local historic district.
Next steps: the applicant said it could submit revised plans for a January hearing; staff asked for time to evaluate any changes. Preservation groups reaffirmed opposition to on-site demolition and urged continued search for alternatives.
