Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasco budget staff warn of slower revenue growth, highlight jail and public-safety cost pressures
Summary
Pasco County budget staff presented revenue projections and cautioned commissioners that taxable-assessed-value growth and certain revenue streams are likely to cool; staff said the county will model 5%, 7% and 9% growth scenarios and flagged detention-center expansion and D-shift staffing as key expense drivers.
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasco County budget officials told the Board of County Commissioners on March 25 that county revenues are likely to grow more slowly than in recent years and that the county will build conservative budgets while accounting for major public-safety and personnel costs.
"We're entering this budget season very conservatively," Amy Farrell, budget director in the Office of Management and Budget, said. Farrell said staff are modeling three scenarios — 5%, 7% and 9% taxable-assessed-value growth — to stress-test the budget as they await preliminary assessed values.
Farrell gave a packet of data and described several revenue trends: new-home permits have shown a slight drop in late 2024 and early 2025, commercial and residential new-construction cycles remain variable, and recent double-digit assessment growth largely stemmed from revaluations and northern migration in prior years. Staff are not expecting the same double-digit revaluation growth in the coming cycle.
On other revenue lines, Farrell said staff project a modest 3% increase for the half-cent sales tax (about 10% of recurring general-fund revenue), a near-flat outlook for state county-revenue-sharing, and a small 2.2% rise in communications service tax despite a long-term downward trend. Farrell also discussed ambulance-fee revenue and said the projection in staff materials reflects a substantial increase compared with prior years.
Farrell and commissioners focused on expense pressures: the county is phasing staffing tied to a detention-center expansion (the first full year of D-shift expenses will fall in FY26), and Fire/Rescue station staffing adjustments will produce first full-year staffing costs in FY26 as well. Farrell warned that personnel, constitutional officer budgets, and elevated materials and supplies costs are applying upward pressure on the budget.
Why it matters: The presentation frames the county's budget path for the fiscal year and signals limited ability to expand services; commissioners indicated they want more detail on jail staffing and d‑shift costs and on progress with road projects and MSTU funding.
What happened next: Commissioners asked for one-on-one briefings and asked staff to return with further details during upcoming workshops; the county will present preliminary assessed values in June and final values in July before public hearings in September.
Ending: Farrell said staff will continue to monitor monthly revenue updates and present scenario outcomes to the board as the budget process progresses.

