Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Beloit council approves consent agenda, annexation, appointments and strategic plan; denies one code exception
Summary
At the meeting the council approved its consent agenda, confirmed several appointments, adopted the 2025 strategic plan, passed a second-reading annexation ordinance, and denied an exception for lighting at 1731 Cranston Road.
Get email alerts on the Council Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its meeting the Beloit City Council took several formal actions summarized below.
- Consent agenda (items 6a—6f): Motion by Councilor Denton, second by Councilor Dade. Council voted to approve the consent agenda; no council discussion was recorded. (Transcript: motion and voice votes recorded.)
- Appointments (item 9): Motion by Councilor Terrell, second by Councilor Day. The council approved appointments including Alcohol Beverage License Control Committee: Thomas Fleming; Appointment Review Committee: Christian Moore; Business Improvement District reappointments: Courtney Prentice, Dennis Senz, Kelly Ekstead; Municipal Golf Committee: Isam Al Amin.
- Ordinance 3858 (item 8a, second reading): An ordinance to annex five properties on the 9400—9500 block of South Creek Road and the 2300 block of Murphy Woods Road from the Town of Turtle to the City of Beloit (second reading): Motion by Councilor Terrell, second by Councilor Adama. Council approved the ordinance on second reading.
- Resolution adopting the 2025 strategic plan (item 12a): Motion by Councilor Terrell, second by Councilor Donna. Council adopted the strategic plan and staff said quarterly updates will be provided to council and the public.
- Exception to Architectural Review and Landscape Code for 1731 Cranston Road (item 4a): Motion to approve the exception moved by Councilor Yousef and seconded by Councilor Terrell; the motion failed after council voice vote. Planning staff and the Planning Commission had recommended denial.
Detailed vote tallies were not specified in the meeting transcript for these voice votes; mover and seconder names are recorded in the minutes and staff reports.

