Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes Summary topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves budget‑committee appointments, administrator contract terms and moves to hear a complaint appeal

2658769 · February 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board confirmed three budget‑committee appointments, approved administrator compensation terms and agreed to consider an appeal of a complaint in executive session; all motions passed by voice vote with no opposition recorded in the meeting minutes.

At its Feb. 20 meeting the Tigard‑Tualatin School District board approved three administrative and governance items by voice vote.

Nominations and appointments: The board appointed three members to the district budget committee for three‑year terms: Corey Morgan (reappointment), Beth Dittman (initial appointment) and Kelly Cameron (initial appointment). The board’s internal interview committee recommended the slate after reviewing applications and interviewing candidates.

Administrator contract terms: The board approved a two‑year agreement covering the administrator group (ADA), the cabinet and the associate superintendent. The package included a 4% cost‑of‑living adjustment for each of the two years, an insurance increase (3.4%) and calendar/work‑year adjustments for secondary administrators and athletic directors (to reflect work tied to master schedules and athletics). The superintendent’s contract had been concluded earlier and was not part of the motion before the board.

Complaint appeal: The board voted to consider a request to appeal a superintendent’s decision regarding a KL complaint and to take that consideration into executive session at a future time; the board did not hear or rule on the merits in open session and no details of the complaint were disclosed.

All three motions were moved, seconded and carried by voice vote with no opposition recorded in the meeting record. Staff will follow up on procedural steps where required (appointment paperwork, contract implementation and scheduling of the executive‑session appeal).