Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Crisis Response topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Police commission approves updated Mental Health Crisis Response Policy 4-18 after discussion
Summary
The Eugene Police Commission voted to approve edits to Policy 4-18, the department—ramework for responding to mental health crises, after an extended review and discussion of co-responder programs, use-of-force language and operational coordination with county behavioral-health partners.
The Eugene Police Commission voted to approve revisions to the Eugene Police Department—ugene Police Department—04Policy 4-18, the Mental Health Crisis Response Policy, following a detailed presentation, public comment and debate among commissioners.
The commission approved the policy with proposed edits after Commissioner Vice Chair Shivers moved to accept the changes and a second was made; the motion passed by voice vote. The final packet and the redline referenced changes submitted by Sergeant Jordan and others and were accepted by the commission.
Why it matters: Policy 4-18 governs how officers respond to people in behavioral-health crises, including when and how to use de-escalation, how to offer diversion or deflection services and how the department documents and handles seized items and evidence. Commissioners flagged language around force, transport, and definitions during the review and sought clarification on how the new policy aligns with county mobile crisis services and community-based responders.
Officers and staff presented the commission with operational context for the policy and described the city—o-responder pilot that pairs a specially trained officer with a qualified mental-health professional. Officer Beau Rankin, who works in the Behavioral Health Coresponder Program, said the pilot began in mid-April and is "going well" but noted that early tracking showed about 53% of people contacted declined services.
Chief Skinner told the commission the department has been integrating deflection options into responses where appropriate and is mindful of legal standards and court precedent when balancing operational needs and policy language. Chief Skinner described how the department uses deflection programs for eligible cases and said that in other instances standard municipal-court or community-court tracks apply.
Commission-level edits and concerns included a request to clarify the policy's use-of-force language and whether references to lethal or deadly force should be excluded. Commissioner Parham pointed to section 4-18.3.b.5 and asked whether the policy should state limitations on specific force options for people in crisis. Sergeant Jordan nd Chief Skinner explained that policy must allow officers to evaluate the totality of circumstances and that legal standards (for example, Graham v. Connor and related Ninth Circuit guidance) require objective assessment rather than on-the-spot clinical diagnoses.
The policy packet also removed older operational references (for example, to a CIT coordinator) because the department said most newer officers now receive Crisis Intervention Training and the role of a single coordinator has diminished.
The commission recorded the vote by voice and subsequently confirmed the motion carried. The policy as amended was approved by the commission at the meeting.
Next steps: The updated Policy 4-18 will be part of the department's operational guidance going forward. Commissioners asked staff to provide clarifying language on retention of seized weapons and on how evidence and transport interact with medical holds, and staff committed to follow-up with more detail in subsequent materials.
Ending: Commissioners thanked staff and community members for their input. The approved policy and the redline version reviewed at the meeting will be added to the commission record.
