Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IGR committee adopts neutral position on bill to extend unemployment benefits during labor disputes pending more information
Summary
The committee voted 3–0 to take a neutral position on Senate Bill 916 (proposal to make unemployment insurance available during labor disputes), citing fiscal uncertainty and potential costs to local governments.
The Intergovernmental Relations Committee voted March 4 to take a neutral position on Senate Bill 916, legislation to provide unemployment benefits to workers who are out of work due to a labor dispute.
IGR staff said earlier drafts of the bill raised questions about the definition of "labor dispute" and the potential fiscal impact on municipalities. Mia Carriaga, central services director, told the committee the city’s opposition had been based on projected local fiscal impacts; she noted that of the city’s six bargaining units, two units are able to strike and that the addition of unemployment benefits could create significant costs if strikes occurred.
Staff described recent amendments shifting benefit start dates from week 1 to week 2 or week 3, and said state fiscal analysts had weighed in that they do not view the measure as an unfunded state mandate, a conclusion that local governments disputed.
Given outstanding questions about fiscal exposure and unresolved amendments, committee members agreed to a neutral position pending further information and possible negotiations; the motion carried by voice vote 3–0.
