Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Police Commission continues review of drone policy, flags FAA and legislative changes
Summary
Commissioners reviewed Policy 9-08 and Appendix A, discussed Drone-as-First-Responder operations, FAA altitude limits and a pending legislative prohibition on facial recognition; no formal action was taken and staff will return with draft revisions after regulatory clarity.
The Eugene Police Commission on Feb. 13 continued its review of the department's Drone Team Policy (Policy 9-08) and Appendix A, including the department's emerging Drone-as-First-Responder (DFR) program. Sergeant Kyle Williams briefed the commission on operational experience, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) limits and an expected wave of state legislative and federal regulatory changes that could require edits to the policy.
Williams said Eugene police drones operate below FAA's general 400-foot ceiling and that the department does not fly above 400 feet. He described work the department has done to obtain a Beyond-Visual-Line-Of-Sight (BVLOS) waiver and said that, if granted, the waiver would likely impose a lower "hard deck" than 400 feet ("200, potentially up to 250") for some operations. Williams described DFR operations—where drones launch quickly to provide situational awareness to first responders—and said that the policy has functioned well but that procedural clarifications are likely as technology and law evolve.
Commissioners raised privacy and data-retention questions. Williams said recorded drone video is uploaded into the department's evidence platform (evidence.com) and is retained according to evidence retention protocols; he did not provide specific retention windows. He told the commission the department prohibits facial-recognition use in its drone policy (Section 9-08.4.c) and that state-level legislation on algorithmic identification is pending; he referenced a legislative sponsor in the state Senate and said the department is tracking that work.
Other points discussed included mutual-aid operations with Springfield (the two cities operate a joint team under an intergovernmental agreement), coordination with Eugene Airport (EUG) and air-traffic control for operations near the municipal airport, and how drones are used during protests. Williams said the department generally waits for "a nexus" to criminal activity before conducting extended aerial surveillance at civil events but will provide brief overwatch when necessary for public-safety purposes. He emphasized that EPD does not seek carte-blanche aerial surveillance of lawful protests.
The commission did not vote on Policy 9-08. Chair Gencino Hawkins and staff agreed to return the item after greater clarity on FAA and legislative developments and after Williams drafts precise procedural language to reflect DFR operations.
