Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Money Transmission topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House committee advances money-transmission modernization bill after amendment votes

2657801 · March 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Labor and Commerce Committee reported House Bill 99 out of committee as amended after debating seven amendments about notice, appeals and record-keeping tied to money-transmission licensing.

The Alaska House Labor and Commerce Committee on March 14 voted to report House Bill 99, a money-transmission regulatory modernization bill carried by Co-chair Zach Fields, out of committee as amended.

The bill, developed at the administration's request, updates licensing and oversight for money services businesses in state statute. Supporters said the measure aligns state rules with federal standards and clarifies regulatory processes; opponents and some committee members pressed for changes to notice, appeals and record-retention language.

Co-chair Zach Fields, who said he carried the bill at the administration’s request, objected to several committee amendments on the grounds they would conflict with federal rules. “The department prefers to keep 30 days, which is in line with the model law. So I will maintain my objection,” Fields said during debate on an amendment to extend the appeal period.

Representative Colom proposed several amendments that the committee debated. Amendment 1 would have required more specific, detailed denial notices to potential applicants and extended the appeal period from 30 to 60 days; the committee rejected that amendment 2–4 on a roll call (yes: Rep. Nelson, Rep. Colom; no: Rep. Burke, Rep. Carrick, Co-chair Fields, Co-chair Hall). Amendment 4 would have shortened the department’s record-keeping requirement from five years to three years; the committee voted it down 2–4 after Fields cited federal record-retention requirements tied to the Bank Secrecy Act. Several other amendments were adopted or withdrawn: amendment 3 was adopted with no objection; amendment 5 was adopted with no objection; amendment 6 was withdrawn; amendment 7, which would have restored original language about disclosure notice and definitions, failed 2–4.

Committee members and the bill sponsor noted that staff from the Division of Banking and related administration officials were available to answer questions during the session. Committee minutes show Director Rob Schmidt and Tracy Reno, chief of examinations, were listed as available to the committee.

After amendment work, the committee voted to report House Bill 99 out of committee “as amended with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes.” The motion was read into the record and the paper work was signed by committee members.

Why it matters: the bill would change how Alaska licenses and oversees entities that transmit money, affecting small-money transmitters and larger financial-service firms operating in the state. Key debates focused on balancing consumer-protection record-keeping and information-sharing with business burdens and federal compatibility.

What’s next: the committee reported the bill out with accompanying fiscal notes; the bill moves to the next step in the legislative process with the committee’s recommendations.