Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate ethics panel hears offer of proof, plays Eggleston statement in probe of Ellsworth contract

2657755 · March 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Montana Senate Ethics Committee continued an adjudicatory hearing over a $170,100 contract with Agile Analytics, hearing the state's offer of proof, admitting a sworn statement and a video from Bryce Eggleston, and debating whether Senator Jason Ellsworth failed to disclose a private interest.

Helena — The Montana Senate Ethics Committee on Friday continued its adjudicatory hearing into contracts tied to former Senate President Jason Ellsworth, as prosecutors presented an offer of proof about what absent witness Bryce Eggleston would have testified and the committee reviewed Eggleston's sworn statement and a roughly 1 hour, 13 minute video statement.

The panel heard the state outline a numbered offer of proof alleging Eggleston repeatedly represented he would voluntarily testify but did not appear, that Eggleston had financial and personal ties to Ellsworth going back years, and that public records and prior sworn statements contradicted parts of Eggleston's testimony. "The state offers the following paragraphs and individual entries as its offer of proof," Special Counsel told the committee when submitting the list of proposed findings, which included invoices and Secretary of State filings the state said showed transfers and shared company roles.

Why this matters: The committee is weighing whether Ellsworth failed to disclose a personal or private interest under Montana's ethics law and whether the contracts at issue — two invoices and related procurement steps that together totaled $170,100 — were appropriate. Special counsel told the panel the question is one of full disclosure and the appearance of impropriety; defense counsel argued the record does not show a disclosable private interest and asked the committee not to treat…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans