Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines to overturn Planning Commission denial of setback variances at Northern Hills Mobile Home Park
Summary
The council left intact a unanimous Planning Commission denial of a requested reduction in front setbacks on eight lots at Northern Hills Mobile Home Park after the applicant appealed; the appeal failed for lack of a motion to overturn.
Springdale City Council on March 11 declined to overturn the Planning Commission’s decision denying a request for reduced front setbacks on eight lots at Northern Hills Mobile Home Park, leaving the denial in place.
The appellant, represented by Ken Weigel, permitting and utility coordinator for RHP Properties, asked the council to allow smaller manufactured homes to be placed on eight existing lots that previously had larger homes. Weigel said the proposal would replace older, larger units with smaller homes and that the community had taken steps to limit street parking and add visitor spaces.
The Fire Department expressed opposition. Chief Holt said the park’s existing nonconforming layout and narrow internal access create operational problems for emergency response and that the department “wouldn’t support it” because of limited side and rear setbacks and the risk of rapid structure-to-structure ignition.
Planning staff said the Planning Commission had recommended denial on a 9-0 vote. City staff explained the parcels are in a legal nonconforming manufactured-home community; because structures had been removed and remained vacant beyond the statutory period, reinstallation must comply with current setback rules unless a variance is granted. Engineers for the applicant, including Matt Fondo of Atwell, said the replacement homes would be smaller than prior units and that they had performed lot-fit analyses showing the requested dimensional variances were necessary to place marketable home sizes on the lots.
No council member moved to overturn the Planning Commission; after a period with no motion, the chair announced the appeal “dies for lack of a motion” and the Planning Commission’s denial stood.
Why it matters: The decision keeps the current ordinance setback rules in force for those lots, which the city and fire department said is important for emergency access. The applicant argued the variances would allow replacement of previously occupied lots and reduce blight by returning homes to vacant pads.
What’s next: With the denial upheld, the applicant may revise plans to comply with existing setbacks or pursue other lawful remedies; no variance was granted by the council.
