Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the New Single Family Home topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design committee conditions material transition and offers styling suggestions for new San Mateo County home
Summary
The committee recommended approval of a one-story new house at 825 Edison Street with a required material-termination detail at an entry corner and several nonbinding design recommendations about color and entry alignment.
Get email alerts on the New Single Family Home topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Mateo County Design Review Committee on March 13 recommended approval of a one-story single-family home proposed for 825 Edison Street, with a mandatory condition that the applicant provide a clear material-termination detail at a primary corner and several nonbinding design suggestions intended to improve the house’s street-facing appearance.
County staff summarized the proposal as a new, one-story, 1,887-square-foot single-family residence with an attached 516-square-foot garage on a 6,250-square-foot parcel; the project record lists a certificate of compliance and indicates removal of one significant tree and only minor grading. Staff advised the committee the project is exempt under CEQA Guidelines section 15303(a) for small new construction; Jonathan Brunn is listed as the project planner and the application was deemed complete Feb. 11, 2025.
Applicant Stephanie Retice introduced herself and described selecting a compact, site-built version of a manufactured home with a darker, “organic” palette and a stone skirting element at the base to help the house sit in the tree-lined setting. She said the design prioritizes indoor-outdoor orientation to the backyard, a covered porch and an entry sequence with views into the house.
Committee members praised the general composition but discussed visible material transitions at the front entry where a contrasting siding panel meets the primary siding. One committee member said that transition, if left as drawn, can appear “painted on” and recommended a wrap or termination detail at an inside corner to make it look intentional; the applicant agreed to provide a clear corner/termination detail. The committee made that detail a condition of its recommendation: the project must show a termination detail that resolves the siding/material transition at the front entry corner (preferred: wrap the wood detail around the corner or provide a deliberate inset/trim detail that reads as an intentional transition).
The committee also offered nonbinding recommendations: warm the primary gray siding slightly to harmonize with the wood and stone accents; consider adjusting the front walkway/entry alignment so the path from the driveway reads more clearly; and carry the stone or complementary material treatment where it will read naturally at inside corners. There were no public speakers on the item.
A motion to recommend approval with the stated condition passed by roll-call vote (Moshe Porter: yes; James Bennington: yes). County staff will incorporate the required termination-detail condition into the permit decision. The committee noted recommendations are advisory and not required for approval; if the applicant accepts the condition the project will not need to return to the committee for that detail.

