Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board agrees to add employee performance bonus committee to next meeting agenda after preliminary debate
Summary
Board members discussed forming a committee to develop an employee performance-bonus plan. The board voted 5–2 to add the proposal to the next regular meeting agenda; no funding or final decision was made.
The New Hanover County Schools Board on April 16 discussed a proposal to form a committee charged with developing an employee performance bonus plan and voted to place the item on the next regular meeting agenda for further consideration.
Board member David Perry described the proposal as an advisory committee whose job would be “to develop a plan, and a plan that this entire board will have to approve.” Perry emphasized the group’s role would be recommendation-only; any payout or program would need full-board approval and funding from future budgets or outside sources. “It will definitely not happen if we don’t go through this process,” Perry said.
Board members voiced a range of concerns about committee membership, metrics and funding. Several members urged inclusion of classroom staff and other frontline employees on the committee: “We need to have teachers, teacher assistants, bus drivers, principals — those kind of people,” one member said, arguing that staff with day-to-day experience were needed to design fair metrics. Other members urged the committee remain independent (ad hoc) rather than folded under finance or HR, because measuring performance requires multidisciplinary input.
Questions about funding were raised. Board members who had spoken with county commissioners said the commissioners were generally supportive in principle but would not commit funds without a comprehensive plan. Board members explicitly said this would not be part of the current year’s budget and could take a year or longer to develop. The transcript cites statutory language (General Statute 115C-302.1) indicating the board has some latitude in how local funds are used for teacher compensation, but no funding commitments were made at the meeting.
The board voted 5–2 to add the employee performance-bonus plan item to the next regular meeting agenda for additional staff work and a fuller plan; no committee was formally appointed and no final action on funding was taken.
Ending: The board directed staff and interested board members to develop a more detailed plan and supporting materials for future consideration; commissioners will be approached only after the board has a comprehensive proposal.
