Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the S 51 Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators approve S 51 as amended, lowering exemption to $1,000 and adding physician certification requirement
Summary
State senators voted to approve S 51 as amended, changing a proposed exemption amount from $2,500 to $1,000, adding a $20 reduction per $1,000 of income above the limit and requiring a physician's certificate documenting assistance with activities of daily living; committee discussion noted data concerns about diagnosis-based eligibility.
State senators approved S 51 as amended, changing the proposed exemption amount from $2,500 to $1,000, adding a $20 ramp-down for each $1,000 of additional income above the limit and requiring a physicians certificate documenting need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).
The amendment was introduced and made part of the motion before the body and was moved by Senator Hardy and seconded by Senator Bullock. Committee members conducted a roll-call vote after discussion and recorded affirmative votes from Senator Beck, Senator Gould, Senator Chapman, Senator Mados, Senator Harty and Senator Cummings; the motion passed as amended.
Supporters described the measure as a targeted relief for a population that may require help with daily activities. During discussion, a participant said Meg Pollitt of the Alzheimers Association provided data showing that many people in the original estimated universe — termed 170,000 and a smaller 6,300 subgroup in discussion — may not have a formal diagnosis, and that the bills requirement for a diagnosis could narrow eligibility further. A sponsor noted that its easier to expand eligibility later than to contract it after enactment.
The amendment changes included: lowering the maximum exemption amount to $1,000 (from $2,500 in earlier drafts); adding a $20 reduction for every $1,000 increase in salary above the eligibility limit; and adding a requirement for a doctors certificate that documents ADL assistance needs. The committee discussed tightening the language on the medical certification and on the criteria for assistance.
Senators raised budget and policy concerns during debate, with at least one member saying the need is worthy but that the proposal represents a big ask in the broader budget context and should remain under discussion as budget deliberations proceed. Another senator said the amendments ratcheting-down provision made the measure more acceptable and expressed hope the conversation would open future exemptions in tax policy.
No statutory references or implementation dates were specified in the discussion recorded in the transcript. The committee did not record a numeric summary of the eligible population beyond the figures discussed in conversation (the 170,000 and 6,300 estimates). The transcript does not show additional executive or administrative steps for implementation beyond the committee approval.
The session also included preliminary discussion of appointment letters earlier in the agenda, but the substantive recorded action for this item was the amendment and passage of S 51 as amended.
