Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chappaqua Board probes International Day display after community backlash; calls for policy review
Summary
Parents, students and board members clashed over a Palestine display at a March 7 international event at 7 Bridges; dozens of public commenters described hurt and safety concerns, prompting the district to tighten vetting of large school events and schedule policy review.
Get email alerts on the Community Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Chappaqua Central School District said it will review the vetting process for outside speakers and displays at school events after an International Day display at 7 Bridges prompted dozens of upset comments from parents and students at the Board of Education meeting March 12.
The district’s superintendent, Dr. Ackerman, told the board that the building principal is reviewing concerns raised about the 7 Bridges event and that the district will increase staff review of large events, including a night-before check of displays by content specialists. "When events happen in our schools during the school day, it is the school district's responsibility to ensure that the events are carried out appropriately and aligned with our board strategic questions and our policies," Dr. Ackerman said.
The item that triggered the controversy was a student/parent display described by several commenters as a Palestine table; some attendees said the table included cultural items and food, while others said it included symbols and quotes they considered political or threatening. Commenters on both sides described feeling unsafe or erased. "To censor anything related to Palestinian culture is another painful erasure," said attendee Leslie Peterson. By contrast, several Jewish students and parents said the display included language or imagery that felt hostile and should not have been allowed during a school-day event. "If a presentation by an adult inside one of our buildings makes even a single kid uncomfortable in their safe space, then we probably need to reconsider it," said board member Matt.
Board members and speakers pressed for clearer processes. Dr. Ackerman said the district had already contacted the American Jewish Committee and scheduled a principals’ meeting with that group; she also said that the policy committee will review the outside-speaker policy and consider adjustments based on the Bell and 7 Bridges concerns. "We will take more of an active role in anchoring large events that happen in our buildings," she said, adding the district will apply the same vetting approach used for Bell International Day going forward.
Public comment at the March 12 meeting lasted more than an hour and a half. Dozens of residents — parents, students and community members — testified about specific incidents: some described children being taunted or called "terrorists," others said they felt administrators had mischaracterized cultural displays or responded inconsistently to complaints. Several speakers asked that the district broaden who it consults when deciding whether a presentation is appropriate and asked for more transparency about the review process. "How do you define values? Because time and again, there seems to be a fundamental disconnect between how you use this word and how we do," said public commenter Shikufe.
Board members acknowledged the depth of the community reaction and asked the administration for concrete next steps. Dr. Ackerman and board leaders said they would (1) review whether current policies were followed in the 7 Bridges incident, (2) collect and summarize community feedback, (3) meet with PTA leaders, (4) convene a meeting with social-media staff about how district posts amplify school events, and (5) provide a written update to the board and the public about the review’s findings and any recommended policy changes. "Our kids deserve that," said board vice president Hillary.
The board did not take formal disciplinary action at the March 12 meeting; instead members asked the administration to return with findings and recommended policy changes at upcoming meetings.

