Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Appropriations reviews Department for Children and Families FY26 budget request
Summary
On March 14, the Vermont Senate Appropriations Committee heard the Department for Children and Families present its FY26 budget request, a package the department described as roughly $673 million with a 3.3% overall increase driven by mixed fund-source changes and several program adjustments.
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On March 14 the Vermont Senate Appropriations Committee heard the Department for Children and Families' FY26 budget request, which department officials said totals about $673 million and reflects a 3.3% overall increase over the prior year.
The agency told the committee the governor's recommendation shifts fund sources: a 3.5% decrease in the general fund, a 1% increase to global commitment, and an overall 3.3% rise in the total appropriation. The department highlighted major line‑item changes tied to caseload shifts, program realignments and federal funding uncertainty.
The budget presentation, delivered by Commissioner Chris Winters and Megan Smeaton, director of the DCF business office, outlined the mix of fund sources that support DCF operations: general fund, special funds, interdepartmental transfers, federal funds and global commitment. Winters said federal funding sources that undergird parts of the budget include SNAP, TANF, LIHEAP, Title IV‑E and Medicaid/global commitment. He told the committee federal conversations have been frequent and at times confusing: "It's a lot of chaos," a description the commissioner used when discussing uncertain federal changes.
Committee members and agency staff discussed several recurring drivers of the FY26 request: changes in caseloads for substitute care and subsidized adoptions (both projected to decline), the proposed childcare financial assistance fund swap, adjustments tied to a new Random Moment Time Study (RMTS) methodology that shifted more labor costs onto the general fund, and one‑time and baseline increases tied to homelessness and shelter operations administered by the Office of Economic Opportunity.
Staff said the presentation materials and a narrative line‑by‑line are posted on the JFO/committee website and that they would answer follow‑up questions after the hearing. Winters and staff emphasized they had limited time in the hearing to walk the committee through line items and offered to return details by follow up when committee members requested specifics.
The committee moved through the line‑by‑line discussion with staff and indicated they will continue review in subsequent sessions and in follow up with DCF staff.

