Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Project Richardson Hall topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees approve $14.75 million Richardson Hall chiller and systems renewal to extend building life, cut carbon
Summary
The Oregon State Board of Trustees approved a $14.75 million capital budget to replace Richardson Hall’s mechanical and fire systems, extend the building’s life by about 15 years and deliver estimated annual energy savings of $423,000.
The Oregon State Board of Trustees voted Jan. 17 to approve a $14,750,000 capital budget for the Richardson Hall chiller midlife renewal project, advancing the work to the construction phase.
The Finance and Administration Committee recommended the project after reviewing design and estimated savings. The project will replace aged mechanical systems and controls, upgrade fire alarms and other systems, and modernize a wood pressure‑treatment laboratory. The committee said the work should extend the building’s useful life by about 15 years and contribute to the university’s carbon‑reduction goals.
Richardson Hall houses key programs in the College of Forestry, including extension programs and the Indigenous Natural Resources office; the building contains more than 200 faculty and graduate students and 57 laboratories, the committee reported.
Project financing and savings: The committee and presenters said the new mechanical systems are expected to yield about $423,000 in annual energy savings. Those savings were presented as sufficient to retire debt service on carbon‑reduction bonds within roughly 10 years. The project also includes college‑funded updates to the wood pressure‑treatment laboratory.
Board action: Trustee Carla moved the motion to approve the project; Trustee Julia seconded. The motion carried by voice vote. No roll‑call tally by individual name was recorded in the public minutes.
Why this matters: The work targets building systems that affect research labs and instruction in the College of Forestry and supports the university’s broader carbon‑reduction commitments and energy‑efficiency strategy.
What was not changed: The approval was limited to the capital budget and advancement to construction; trustees did not change academic programs or the building’s assigned uses.
Ending: Project managers will proceed with construction planning and coordination with the college; Paul Odenthal was available to answer trustee questions during the meeting.
