Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Transportation Cameras topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Albany County presents automated ‘bus‑patrol’ camera program to RCS board
Summary
Albany County officials described a camera-and-ticketing program that sends automated notices to registered vehicle owners after school-bus passing violations, outlined revenue uses and appeal procedures, and said installations take about two months.
Albany County representatives described a camera-and-ticketing program for school buses to the Ravena‑Coeymans‑Selkirk Central School District Board of Education, saying the county and private vendor would install equipment at no cost to the district and that automated notices go to the registered owner of a vehicle captured passing a stopped school bus.
The county program, launched in November 2022, charges $250 per recorded violation; presenters said 60% goes to the private bus‑patrol vendor and 40% to Albany County. County presenters said revenue has funded public education campaigns (billboards, transit and arena advertising) and safety programs for students, including a defensive‑driving reimbursement and a proposed driver’s‑education subsidy for participating districts.
Mike Wright, identified as an Albany County bus‑patrol representative, said installations typically take about two months and that the vendor schedules work similar to regular bus maintenance: buses rotate out of service for installs and return to the fleet. Wright and county staff said the vendor’s recordings are tied to vehicle registration so notices are mailed to the registered owner rather than relying on local enforcement to identify drivers.
Board members raised questions about how the program interacts with the district’s existing bus camera system. Presenters said the new cameras can coexist with RCS equipment and that the district would retain access to its own recordings. The county said bus‑patrol technicians handle equipment maintenance and that the vendor contracts technicians to do on‑site work when needed.
Presenters described the program’s review process for tickets: county staff or the vendor reviews video before a ticket is issued, and officials said about 10% of citations are appealed or challenged. The presenters said the majority of recipients accept the citation after viewing video clips provided online. The board asked about timeline, costs and whether there was any direct revenue to RCS; presenters said there is no direct revenue to the district but encouraged districts to propose uses for county funds, such as driver’s education, defensive‑driving classes, or locally chosen safety initiatives.
The board asked the county to circulate the three‑party opt‑in agreement — between the district, Albany County and the vendor — for review and possible future action.
Proponents and presenters repeatedly framed the effort as focused on changing motorist behavior rather than generating revenue: “the ideal scenario is eventually motorist behavior changes and we don't get any revenue,” a presenter said.
