Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laborers union asks commissioners to review low bid; county staff and engineers defend procurement
Summary
Laborers Local 758 asked Lorain County commissioners to review a contract bid that was roughly $817,000 lower than four other bids on a stormwater project, citing concerns contractors may undercut the market and later seek change orders.
Chuck Broghey, business manager for Laborers Local 758, told the board under agenda comment that five bids were received on a recent stormwater project and that one bid was roughly $817,000 lower than the other four. He asked commissioners to review the documentation to understand how such a spread was possible and to guard against contractors undercutting the market and later seeking change orders.
County staff and project engineers responded in the meeting. Staff said the solicitation generated many contractor questions and two addenda; Marks Construction had submitted repeated clarification requests and is experienced in this type of wetland work. The county said the bid packet and bidder qualifications were reviewed, including checks for mathematical errors and federal/state debarment lists, and that the project will be subject to prevailing-wage oversight and performance-bond requirements.
Why it matters: Large bid spreads can trigger concerns about bid accuracy, compliance with specifications and potential downstream change orders that increase project costs. The union asked the board to ensure a fair, transparent process that protects both taxpayers and responsible contractors.
Key points - Public comment: Chuck Broghey said four bids clustered together while one bidder was $817,000 below the others and urged the board to review the low bid before award. - County response: Purchasing and engineering staff said they issued two addenda and fielded extensive vendor questions; Marks Construction frequently contacted staff for clarifications and has experience doing wetland-restoration projects. - Oversight: Staff said the county sent bid materials for external review (KEM), checked debarment lists, and will enforce prevailing-wage rules and require performance bonds on the project. - Outcome: Despite the union’s request for additional scrutiny, the board approved the awarded contract (see project article). Commissioners said they would monitor change orders and contract performance.
Ending: County staff pledged continued oversight during construction; the board approved the project and asked staff to watch for change orders and prevailing-wage compliance.
