Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Out Of State Trade Offices topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate panels approve bill allowing DBEDT discretion on out‑of‑state trade offices after debate about Philippines post

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers voted to pass HB437 HD1 allowing DBEDT to operate out‑of‑state offices; testimony focused on whether a proposed Philippines office yields a measurable return on investment and the office budgeted recurring costs of roughly $175,000–$200,000 were discussed.

The Senate committees on Economic Development and Tourism and on Transportation and Culture and the Arts on March 13 voted to pass House Bill 437, House Draft 1, which addresses the operation of out‑of‑state trade offices by the state.

DBEDT staff and business groups testified in support while committee members pressed DBEDT staff for details about costs and expected return on investment for a potential new office in the Philippines. Mark Ritchie, identified in the hearing as representing DBEDT, said the department already maintains offices in Beijing and Taiwan and that the proposal would be a forward‑looking effort to expand trade ties with the Philippines, a market DBEDT described as growing.

Senator Kim and other committee members asked whether the agency had evaluated continuing staffing in existing offices, including an ongoing staffing transition in the Taiwan office, and whether an in‑country office was the best use of funds. Ritchie acknowledged the department was "reevaluating 1 person who was stuck in the office in Taiwan" and said a new staffer would be assigned shortly. He estimated the recurring cost of an office would amount to about $175,000 to $200,000 per year and said the agency already uses other export‑development programs and trade missions.

Committee members emphasized DBEDT should present a prioritization plan showing which target countries would offer the best return for limited state funds. Senator Kim asked for post‑hearing materials and a sister‑state report to show existing offices and past results.

The committees adopted the chair’s recommendation to pass HB437 HD1 with technical amendments and a defective date of July 1, 2050. For the Committee on Economic Development and Tourism the recommendation was adopted with recorded votes including the chair (aye), Senator Fukunaga (aye), Senator Kim (recorded as voting with reservations), and Senator Owa (no). The Committee on Transportation and Culture and the Arts also adopted the recommendation (chair’s recommendation adopted with five members present). The bill will proceed with the committee amendments and the noted defective date.

The record shows testimony in support from the Filipino Chamber of Commerce of Hawaii and individuals named Randall John Francisco and Melody Calasee; members asked DBEDT to provide a plan and evaluation of current out‑of‑state offices and explicit return‑on‑investment analyses before new funding is appropriated.