Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oil And Gas Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff says oil company missed required renditions; penalty, corrected valuations followed
Summary
Cheyenne County staff told commissioners an oil company failed to file required production renditions by the April 1 deadline, prompting a 50% penalty, a retroactive valuation and subsequent corrected monthly production data from the royalty owner that allowed county staff to recalculate declines.
Cheyenne County commissioners heard a report that an oil operator did not file required production renditions on time, prompting the county to apply a penalty and re-value production for tax purposes.
County staff said Arcadia (identified in the meeting transcript as the operator) failed to file required renditions by the April 1 deadline and instead reported annual sales figures as equal monthly production. “They filed those by April 1. They did not,” the staff member said, adding the county applied a 50% penalty to the operator’s filings and produced provisional valuations based on the incomplete information.
Why it matters: County staff said the operator’s reporting method — dividing yearly sales evenly across months — prevented the office from calculating quarter-to-quarter decline rates. That made initial valuations inaccurate enough that a royalty owner, identified in the meeting as Fisher Family Farms, paid under protest and then obtained more accurate monthly production records from the company. With that supplemental data, county staff said they were able to “actually come up with a decline.”
Staff described the sequence to commissioners during the abatements and tax-rendering discussion. The staff member said they increased the assessed amount after using the best available data submitted by Arcadia, then later accepted corrected monthly production supplied after contact from the royalty owner. The staff member said this produced a revised decline and adjusted valuation.
Commissioners did not debate a change to county policy during the discussion; staff framed the matter as a data and compliance issue. No formal action tied to the Arcadia matter was recorded beyond the routine approval of abatements later in the meeting.
The staff member also noted the county imposed a 50% penalty on the company’s filings to prompt compliance, and that a postal receipt later produced by the operator indicated a mailing on the day filings were due; staff said the county gave the operator the benefit of the doubt and accepted corrected renditions once received.
Ending: County staff said they expect better, timely reporting from the operator going forward; commissioners moved on to other agenda items after the explanation.
