Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews first reading of facility‑naming policy; staff adds criteria and removes memorial section
Summary
The board reviewed the first reading of a revised facility‑naming policy on March 11 that adds criteria for naming rights, requires written naming agreements and removes a memorials section, and asked staff to return with a second reading and administrative regulations.
The San Marino Unified Board of Education received a first reading on March 11 of a revised board policy (BP 73/10 naming of facility) establishing criteria and process for naming district schools, buildings and facilities.
Staff said the revised policy replaces the word "shall" with "may" to give the board discretion, and explicitly allows naming for individuals or entities who made "outstanding contributions" (including financial contributions), individuals of statewide or national significance, students who died while enrolled, or the geographic area where the facility is located. The policy expands the list of named facilities to include classrooms, laboratories, libraries, gymnasiums, auditoriums, stadiums, fields, tracks, administration buildings and other centers, and allows naming of furnishings used for administration or instruction.
Naming rights language added criteria the board may consider, including that the donation amount be "substantial relative to the cost of the facility," alignment with district values, and a requirement that former employees or board members have provided at least 25 years of exemplary service to qualify. The proposed written agreement for naming rights would specify benefits to the district, rules and responsibilities, the duration of the naming right and prohibit messages that advocate or endorse illegal activity, substance use or unlawful discrimination. The policy reserves the district's authority to terminate naming rights if the grantee engages in prohibited acts or other conduct that could bring the district into disrepute. Staff said the separate administrative regulation could contain procedural details such as application processes and any dollar thresholds.
Staff also said the policy removes a previously proposed memorials section and that district counsel reviewed the language. Board members asked whether existing named facilities would be affected if a building were later torn down; staff replied that a case‑by‑case approach would be used and the district is not under an obligation to transfer a name to a different facility. Questions were raised about whether the policy should specify dollar amounts; staff recommended leaving amounts to an administrative regulation to retain flexibility.
Why it matters: The policy sets criteria that the board would use to evaluate naming and naming‑rights requests, including financial contributions, service thresholds for longtime employees and safeguards to avoid reputational or legal issues.
Ending: Staff will return the policy for a second reading and adoption at a later meeting and will draft recommended administrative regulations to implement procedural elements.
