Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 2025 Financing Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City treasurer presents $168M general‑obligation and $307M utility financing targets; timeline aims for April sale
Summary
City Treasurer Mark Hute reviewed the city’s 2025 financing plan, proposing up to $168 million in tax‑supported general obligation proceeds and $307 million in utility system revenue obligations, and describing voter authorization, debt structure and a timeline to sell bonds in April and receive proceeds in May.
Mark Hute, the city treasurer, briefed the council on the city’s 2025 financing plan, describing how the city uses debt to finance major capital projects and presenting draft target proceeds of $168 million for general obligation (G.O.) financing and $307 million for utility system revenue obligations.
Hute said the G.O. target would fund libraries, parks, public safety and transportation projects, with about 63% of the proposed G.O. proceeds budgeted for public safety projects. He described the financing process—from capital improvement planning to voter authorization for qualified G.O. issuances—and said the new issuances have a maximum maturity of 25 years and are being prepared with a standard 10‑year noncallable period to improve market competitiveness.
Hute noted the utility obligations would fund electric, gas, water and wastewater projects, with roughly two‑thirds of the utility proceeds directed toward water projects and the largest single utility items named in the presentation were the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) program, the Central Mesa reuse pipeline and expansion of the Signal Butte Water Treatment Plant.
On timing, Hute proposed council authorization followed by a bond sale in the week of April 21 and receipt of proceeds in mid‑May. Bond counsel Zach Sakas of Greenberg Traweg and finance staff participated in the presentation; the city’s finance team and outside advisors will continue work with rating agencies and refine sale timing and structure. Hute and bond counsel explained the rationale for a noncallable window as a market strategy: giving investors certainty typically lowers interest cost.
Council members asked questions about the bond capacity calculation, timing of issuances, the effect on the secondary property tax rate, and whether the city could prepay or defease debt. Staff said some planned proceeds will reimburse prior city expenditures and that federal tax rules limit issuing tax‑exempt debt for projects that are not yet ready to spend; staff described managing the issuance schedule to smooth taxpayers’ secondary levy rather than producing large spikes. Finance staff said the city currently holds reserves and that one near‑term change in the payment schedule reflects applying some available principal payments in the current year.
No bond sale or issuance was approved at the study session; the presentation was informational and staff indicated they would return with sale details and final recommendations for council consideration during the authorization process.
Ending: Staff will continue coordination with bond counsel, the city’s financial advisor and rating agencies. Council members signaled interest in continued discussion of timing, project prioritization and the operational impacts of added capital assets; Hute said staff would return with further details when market timing and structure are set.
