Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carbondale trustees refine community grant rules; consider higher caps for special events
Summary
Trustees reviewed the town's annual community grant program, discussed whether to raise award caps, simplify categories and formalize recusal rules for trustees with nonprofit ties; they asked staff to return with a revised process for adoption.
Trustees reviewed the town’s community grant program and directed staff to return with a simplified and more predictable process: keep the overall funding formula but consolidate categories, raise award caps for special events, and adopt a clear recusal method for trustees with ties to applicants.
Patrick and Lauren presented background: the grant program has existed at least since 2005 and is currently funded using a set percentage of municipal revenue (historically described as "1%" for planning purposes). Trustees debated whether to (a) maintain the one‑percent funding formula, (b) add a separate capped pool for special events, and (c) simplify application categories used to organize the reviewers’ work.
Trustees favored keeping the overall 1% funding approach but recommended removing a confusing “recreation” sub‑pool and instead consolidating applicants into two categories: local nonprofits and special events. Under the trustees’ direction, staff will propose new caps: an increased cap for general nonprofit awards (suggested moving to $7,000) and a higher cap for special events (suggested $10,000). Trustees said the special‑events cap would allow established festivals and town events some additional support without creating an open‑ended entitlement.
Recusal process: Trustees also agreed to formalize recusal handling when board members have relationships with applicants. The board asked staff to prepare a simple, auditable approach: trustees should mark a recusal in the scoring grid and staff will pro‑rate allocations so a recusal does not block funding to an applicant or skew totals for other applicants.
Community input: Andrea, representing the Carbondale Chamber of Commerce, told trustees the current application is straightforward for applicants and urged the town to consider the economic development value of special events when setting award levels. Trustees said they will ask the Environmental Board about any bag‑fee fund tie‑ins for waste‑diversion grants and will consider tobacco‑tax grant allocations separately.
Next steps: Staff will return with a recommended allocation table, a cleaned‑up application and scoring sheet, and a draft recusal procedure for the board to adopt prior to the next grant cycle.
