Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carbondale trustees adopt updated short-term rental rules after debate over inspections
Summary
The Carbondale Board of Trustees approved Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2025, updating licensing rules for short-term rentals. Trustees debated the scope of initial inspections before the roll-call vote produced a 6–1 approval.
Carbondale trustees on Tuesday approved Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2025, amending Chapter 6, Article 10 of the Carbondale Municipal Code to revise licensing requirements for short-term rentals.
Trustees debated how intrusive the new inspection rules should be before a roll-call vote. Several trustees said staff had pared back a previous proposal; others said they remained concerned about enforcement discretion and warrantless inspections. Trustee Jess said she “still don't agree with the inspection process” and that the proposal “still says that they can go in at any time and inspect.”
The ordinance as adopted keeps an initial inspection on first application but removes a requirement for inspection on renewal, a compromise trustees discussed at length. Trustee Chris made the motion to approve and Trustee Colin seconded it. In a roll-call vote Trustee Hassig, Trustee Cribbs, Trustee Laird, Trustee Montemayor, Trustee Spirehawk and Mayor Ben voted yes; Trustee Robeson voted no. The motion passed 6–1.
The ordinance updates licensing language in the municipal code; staff told trustees the ordinance reflects prior direction and recommendations from town staff. Board members who supported the ordinance said staff had recommended keeping at least an initial on-site inspection. Opponents said the language still allowed inspections that could be burdensome to operators and signaled a need for future clarity on enforcement thresholds.
Trustees also discussed how to handle consent-agenda items and meeting-procedure changes tied to the code of conduct for bringing items forward from public comment. That procedural clarification — separate from the ordinance debate — is intended to formalize when two trustees may bring items forward versus when an immediate in-meeting request requires three trustees’ concurrence.
The changes to Chapter 6, Article 10 are now adopted; trustees directed staff to proceed with implementation steps described in the ordinance packet. Questions about specific inspection triggers and enforcement protocols remained open and were raised as items staff will follow up on in future packets.
For the full recorded discussion, trustees referenced the ordinance language and adopted motion during the meeting.
