Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Continuance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manatee County staff continue eight zoning items to March and April 2025 dates
Summary
At a brief Manatee County planning announcement, staff announced that eight pending zoning and land‑use ordinance items were continued to dates in March and April 2025; no public testimony or formal votes were recorded in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Continuance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manatee County staff announced continuances for eight zoning and land‑use ordinance items, moving each to a later hearing date in March or April 2025.
County staff made the announcements near the start of a planning meeting; each item was described by ordinance or project code and then continued to a specific date without recorded debate or a formal roll‑call vote in the transcript supplied. The continuances affect a mix of county-initiated and applicant requests, including a comprehensive plan text amendment and multiple rezone and planned development items.
The items and new hearing dates as announced were: item 1 (Zoning Ordinance PA 2501 / Ordinance 25‑14, county‑initiated comp plan text amendment) continued to March 27, 2025; item 2 (PDR 24‑15 ZG, Pope Ranch) continued to April 10, 2025; item 3 (PDMU 24‑13 ZG, Innovation Business Park at Seaport Manatee) continued to March 27, 2025; item 4 (PDR 24‑23 ZP, Hawthorne rezone) continued to March 27, 2025; item 5 (PDMU 16‑12 G R 2, Lorraine Corners NE revised GDP) continued to March 27, 2025; item 6 (PDC 04‑38 PR2, Creekside Commons PSP modification) continued to March 27, 2025; item 7 (PDR 24‑19 P, Cedar Cove) continued to March 27, 2025; and item 8 (PDR 23‑51 ZP, Crosswind South) continued to March 27, 2025.
The transcript shows the announcements and adjournment but does not record motions, seconds, vote tallies, or public comment on these items. Where the text identified an item code but did not provide further substance (for example, specific ordinance text or staff reports), the article notes those details as not specified in the transcript.
Copies of the county agenda or staff reports, or the March 27 and April 10 hearing agendas, would be needed to see staff recommendations, permit conditions, or any substantive changes tied to these continuances. The transcript indicates the meeting was brief and procedural; no additional action was recorded in the supplied audio/text.

