Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances stage‑1 policy proposals including student ex officio member and strengthened audit provisions
Summary
The board advanced several stage‑1 policy reviews March 13, including a policy to add an ex officio student board member elected by South Side High School students, and updates strengthening audit and fraud-reporting procedures.
Get email alerts on the Board Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rockville Centre Board of Education moved several policy reviews forward at its March 13 meeting, including a new policy to add an ex officio student member and several policy updates concerning audits and financial oversight.
President Barry and district staff described the ex officio student-member policy as a way to formalize student voice and to comply with a cited state reference (referred to in the discussion as "New York’s Education Law 17 O 2 Part 3"). Under the proposed process, an ex officio student would be elected by the student body at South Side High School and invited to sit at board meetings without voting rights; the policy document would not expect the student to attend routine July/August reorganizational meetings. The board agreed to advance the policy to stage 2 for further review.
Separately the board reviewed and moved to the next stage related policies on allegations of fraud (including whistleblower protection and a chain-of-command reporting procedure), creation of an audit committee, and a district internal-audit function. Administrators said these items clarify accountability steps, identify the audit committee’s role in corrective action plans and confirm the claims auditor’s continuing role in checking expenses.
Two additional policies were discussed: information-security breach notification (held at stage 1 pending clarification of language) and accounting for fixed assets (which expands capital-asset language to include intangible assets such as software licenses). Trustees asked for clarifying language and indicated they expected staff to return with refined wording at a subsequent meeting.
Board members asked for public feedback on specific language and discussed timing for implementation. The motion for stage-1 advancement passed on voice vote for the items taken up that evening.

