Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Danbury School District reports $8.6 million month, $8.5 million favorable year-to-date variance after reclassification
Summary
District finance staff reported a $8.6 million month expenditure and a year-to-date favorable variance of about $8.5 million driven largely by salary/benefit reclassifications and timing differences in utilities and supplies; auditors flagged a material weakness tied to a prior cyber incident.
Mike Weaver, a district finance staff member, told the Danbury School District committee on Feb. 12 that expenditures for the month ending July 31 were $8.6 million and year-to-date expenditures were about $70.9 million with roughly $80.6 million encumbered against a $160 million budget. "If the year were to end right now, we'd have an $8,500,000 favorable variance," Weaver said, attributing most of the variance to salary and benefit reclassifications into grant accounts and to timing in supply and utility spending.
The reclassification work moved positions and their benefits from the general fund into an Alliance grant account, producing a favorable variance in salary and benefits lines. Weaver said the reclassification was time-consuming and partly retroactive: "These adjustments now are making corrections the way they should be," he said, and cautioned that the timing of the adjustments distorts the current-period presentation.
Committee members and Superintendent Dr. Casimiro pressed for continued cleanup of line-item detail and for additional months of reconciled numbers before treating the favorable variance as recurring. Dr. Casimiro said she and staff are monitoring open positions and suggested using some of the freed salary dollars to start positions that would support schools earlier in the year rather than closing the fiscal year with unspent payroll funds. "I'd hate to sit on $8,000,000 in salaries when we can put it to use," she said.
Watch items identified in discussion included workers' compensation (a current negative variance discussed as likely to grow), special-education tuition (which the finance team said may be underbudgeted for the year), and bank reconciliation and subsidiary record catch-up work (addressed elsewhere in the meeting). Finance staff called out a favorable variance in electric costs and a $485,000 favorable variance in instructional supplies but advised that timing, not permanent savings, largely explains those lines.
The committee discussed procurement timing and purchase-order practices that delay year-end close. Members urged clearer internal deadlines for submitting requisitions (May was suggested) to avoid last-minute POs that encumber funds but do not reflect true liabilities. The committee asked staff to continue reconciling variances and to add clearer notes to the monthly statement so members can track the makeup of large variances.
No formal board votes were taken on spending actions during the meeting. The finance staff said they expect to need another month or two to complete cleanup of several lines and to provide clearer year-to-date narratives for budget presentation to the city.
