Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff brief board on federal grants, warn of potential disruption if state action shifts
Summary
Administrators outlined the district’s major federal grants, including Title programs and the National School Lunch Program, and explained that about 7.6% of the district budget comes from federal sources; board members asked questions about contingency planning if federal funding channels change.
District staff told the Quincy School Board that federal grants fund multiple essential programs — and that changes at the federal or state level could affect those funds.
Why it matters: The board sought clarity about how much of the district budget depends on federal funding and how quickly programs would be affected if federal administration or state pass-through arrangements changed.
Victoria Hodge and staff explained that a large portion of the district’s federal funding consists of longstanding, statutory grants such as Title I (part A and C), special education, and Title III for multilingual learners. Staff said the National School Lunch Program administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture provides roughly "$2,400,000" to feed students in low-income communities in the district.
Presenters also placed federal support in context. A staff member told the board that "in total from the federal government, we get 7.6% of our budget" and that, after removing USDA school-meal funding, federal academic grants account for about "5% of our budget." The presentation noted that most of the district’s Title grants are noncompetitive and derive from statutes that predate the Department of Education.
Board members asked for contingency clarity. One board member asked whether the money would disappear if the U.S. Department of Education were eliminated; staff replied that while the federal agency’s structure could change, the underlying statutory funding flows (for example, provisions in ESSA and earlier acts) would not necessarily vanish and that any reorganization would likely preserve grant mechanisms or move them between agencies. Staff also said a state-level decision to refuse federal guidance could place certain funds at risk.
Other details: During discussion board members raised how districts distribute supports (for example, subsidized event tickets) and asked whether some program costs are a mix of state and federal funds. The presentation led to a request that the board stay informed as federal and state policy developments continue.
