Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Gun Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Monroe County presenters ask Pleasant Valley SD to allow student gun-safety survey and support voluntary weapon storage

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Presenters for a state-funded gun-safety pilot told the Pleasant Valley Board of Education the program would run anonymous high-school surveys and offer voluntary temporary weapon storage for households in crisis; the board did not take a vote but heard questions about scope, privacy and timing.

Representatives of a state-funded gun-safety pilot told the Pleasant Valley School District board on March 13 that Monroe County is a pilot site and asked permission to run an anonymous student survey and to publicize a voluntary weapon-storage option for households experiencing mental-health crises.

The presenters said the three-year grant funds a two-part effort: an anonymous, SurveyMonkey questionnaire of high-school students to identify exposure to firearms and a county-run program that temporarily stores weapons for families who request help during a crisis. They said the effort is intended to reduce “unexpected discharges” — accidental or impulsive shootings in homes where firearms are not stored securely — and to gather information that will shape noncurricular safety programming delivered by sheriff’s deputies and partner agencies, not by classroom teachers.

Why it matters: Monroe County’s presenters told the board the county’s suicide-death rate by firearm is above state and national averages and that a pilot there could inform a statewide approach. The survey results would be used to design voluntary, community-based safety education and local events where owners could receive free safety devices and learn secure storage techniques.

What presenters proposed and how it would operate Presenters said the survey would target high-school students only; they asked that the district allow the survey to be administered in May, during a class period determined by each building. They said the instrument is already reviewed and framed to avoid the need for a local institutional review board; responses would be anonymous and collected through SurveyMonkey. Examples of survey items described to the board include whether students have seen someone threaten another person with a gun, seen someone hurt another person with a gun, heard gunfire in public, or know someone who attempted or died by suicide using a gun.

Presenters said educational programming would not be part of the school curriculum and would not add teachers or classroom instruction. Instead, the sheriff’s office and partner agencies would offer voluntary community sessions at offsite venues such as firehouses and community centers, and training would also be offered to adults who choose to attend.

On weapons storage, presenters described an opt-in county service: if a household notifies law enforcement that someone in the home is experiencing a mental-health crisis and the household requests help, the county will take possession of and securely store firearms for a period of time. Presenters emphasized repeatedly that storage is voluntary and that the program is not intended to confiscate legally owned firearms or to limit Second Amendment rights; they said storage is offered only at the owner’s request.

Board and public questions Board members and community attendees asked about age limits for the student survey, confidentiality and the mechanics of storage. Presenters said the survey would be administered only to high-school students, that answers would be anonymous with no way to match responses back to individual students, and that storage would occur only when requested by the owner or guardian. Presenters also said the pilot was approved by the county commissioners and run through the Monroe County district attorney’s office, and that the county had been chosen because of local data showing higher-than-average firearm suicide deaths.

Next steps and timeline Presenters asked only for the board’s permission to administer the survey and to share information about the voluntary storage service. They said the grant covers three years, that Monroe County is a state pilot site, and that they plan to schedule the survey in May if districts agree. The board did not vote on the request during the meeting; presenters said they would visit other nearby boards in coming days as part of the pilot rollout.

Ending Presenters left the board copies of the survey and materials and said they would share the final questionnaire with district leaders before implementation. Board members asked staff to review the materials and confirm logistics and privacy safeguards before any administration of the survey.