Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Edu Technology Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MPS seeks parent consent for Google’s non-core services after vendor notice
Summary
The district notified parents that Google’s recent change requires explicit parental consent to use certain non-core Google services (YouTube, Maps, Earth, News, Bookmarks). The district enabled YouTube restricted mode and will require signed opt-in forms by March 14 for spring implementation or default to opt-in next fall.
District technology and curriculum leaders told the committee that Google informed school customers that its standard data-privacy agreement covers a set of core services (Gmail, Drive, Classroom, Docs, Meet and similar tools) but does not automatically cover a number of additional Google offerings. Mansfield staff identified five additional services in current classroom use — Google Bookmarks, Google Earth, Google Maps, Google News and YouTube — and the district has begun seeking parental consent to continue using those services with students.
The district has enabled YouTube’s restricted mode to limit mature content and disabled comments for district use. Technology staff said that if parents withhold consent for YouTube, teachers can embed specific videos in Google Slides or other district-controlled materials as an alternative so students without consent can access equivalent instruction. The district will collect written permission forms that went home to families beginning the week of March 3 with a return date of March 14; forms will be logged in Aspen (the student information system). Because the notice from Google arrived with only weeks before the end of the school year, the district told parents it will treat missing forms as “yes” for the remainder of the school year and will adopt an opt-in recordkeeping approach next fall.
District staff said attorneys advised against using Google’s own signature tools for consent forms and that the district will use signed hard copies for the short-term implementation. Staff also proposed follow-up communications and staff training to ensure teachers know how to provide alternatives where students do not have consent. Committee members asked about filtering and web controls; technology staff said district filtering tools (for example GoGuardian) and administrative controls limit access to inappropriate content and that district staff can embed or present video content to maintain equal instructional access for students who do not have consent.
The committee did not vote on policy at the meeting; technology and communications staff asked the committee to note the expedited timeline and to expect follow-up information about fall procedures for long-term consent tracking.
