Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing Legacy Crossing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Legacy Crossing PUD amendment on first reading after lengthy public debate over traffic and safety

2611163 · March 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Loveland City Council voted to approve, on first reading, an amendment to the Crossroads Planned Unit Development to allow Legacy Crossing — a mixed, largely affordable housing neighborhood proposed by the Loveland Housing Authority — to move forward.

The Loveland City Council voted to approve, on first reading, an amendment to the Crossroads Planned Unit Development to allow Legacy Crossing — a mixed, largely affordable housing neighborhood proposed by the Loveland Housing Authority — to move forward. The vote followed many hours of public comment focused on traffic and pedestrian safety at the Duffield Avenue / 50th Street corridor.

Under the approved first-reading ordinances the PUD is amended to allow up to 335 dwelling units and to terminate an older annexation agreement that is now obsolete. The project mixes multifamily rental housing and single-family homeownership options: the Loveland Housing Authority will deliver apartments, Habitat for Humanity and Mission Homes will deliver deed‑restricted homeownership and other builders will build additional single-family product and duplexes to serve 30–120% of area median income (AMI), depending on product type.

Developer and project leaders said the plan preserves wetland areas, increases housing diversity and incorporates a 75-foot buffer between new lots and the existing Alfred Meadows neighborhood. "This project will serve 30% to 120% AMI households and bring a varied set of homeownership and rental options," Jeff Fenis, executive director of the Loveland Housing Authority, told council.

Traffic and safety were the most frequent topics during public comment. Transportation staff and the applicant’s engineers said multiple traffic-impact studies were produced; the city’s analysis shows the Duffield / 50th intersection could be restricted to a three‑quarter movement (no northbound left turn) while still meeting adequate community facilities (ACF) standards in the near term. Staff also noted a modern roundabout at 50th/Duffield would be a preferred long‑term solution: city engineering estimated the full roundabout would require significant grading and right‑of‑way work and placed an order‑of‑magnitude cost around several million dollars. Transportation staff said the three‑quarter restriction was the mitigation that met ACF in the short term while leaving the larger roundabout as a potential future capital project.

Neighbors asked the council to require construction of a roundabout before any occupancy, or at least to secure a firm funding path for it. Several residents said a lack of a controlled pedestrian crossing at the Duffield / 50th intersection will force people to walk a half-mile out of direction to reach the Sunset Vista trailhead and commercial services and raised concerns about children and walking access to the neighborhood pool. The city’s traffic staff said the planned development will generate about 3,000 daily trips and that Duffield and 50th will remain below major‑collector thresholds after the development; staff also said they will require traffic‑calming designs on Duffield along the southern boundary and will review traffic operations once site‑level plans are submitted.

Developers and affordable‑housing partners emphasized the project’s urgency and public benefits. “This is a gold‑standard affordable project,” said Megan Locke of Impact Development Fund, which provides mortgage tools; Habitat for Humanity’s leadership described long waiting lists and the local workforce that will benefit. Project representatives said they had expanded outreach and voluntarily increased the south boundary buffer to 75 feet in response to neighbor input.

Planning Commission recommended approval 6–1; commissioners who voted to approve cited the project’s housing benefits and preservation of wetlands. The dissenting commissioner cited a desire for earlier capital investment on the intersection. Council approved the PUD amendments on first reading (6–0 in the recorded roll call) and terminated the obsolete annexation agreement by separate ordinance. Because the item was approved on first reading council will vote on final reading at a later meeting; city staff said detailed traffic engineering and final site plans will be required and will determine specific turning restrictions, crosswalks and the timing of any capital improvement work.

What to watch: the next steps are site‑development plans and permit‑level engineering. Per the council discussion, traffic calming along Duffield and the design for the Duffield/50th intersection will be refined during the SDP and permit review and will determine whether future capital dollars or alternative financing will be required to build a roundabout or signalized crossing.