Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Domestic Violence Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee finds H.222 as amended favorable; adds domestic-violence reporting, expanded relief options

2608957 · March 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Judiciary committee voted to find H.222 (draft 4.1) as amended favorable after members added a reporting requirement tied to the Fatality Review Commission and broadened protections and program options for survivors, including expanded vehicle-use relief and stalking-by-geolocation conduct.

The Judiciary committee voted to find draft number 4.1 of H.222, as amended, favorable following debate on provisions that add a reporting requirement to the Fatality Review Commission and expand remedies and accountability options for domestic-violence survivors.

The amendment moves a one-time reporting request into ongoing statutory reporting tied to the Fatality Review Commission and adds an option for participation in a domestic-violence accountability or awareness program. In committee discussion, a legislator identified as Story said the change shifts emphasis toward prevention and a more holistic response to domestic violence: “I appreciate what this may represent in terms of helping to shift our thinking about prevention of domestic violence.” Story also praised provisions that would allow a plaintiff seeking relief-from-abuse relief to be awarded use of a vehicle to escape abuse and the inclusion of stalking-by-geolocation in the statute.

Drill-down: the amendment replaces a standalone session-law request for a single report with a standing reporting requirement placed in the body of statute that defines the Fatality Review Commission and its duties (the transcript refers to this as placement “in the green books”). Committee members discussed removing criminal penalties in favor of an incentive-based (“carrot”) approach for program participation; as described in committee remarks, language initially tied to criminal penalties under a cited statute was adjusted to a non-criminal compliance pathway and paired with reporting so the commission and lawmakers can assess whether further tightening is required.

Action taken: a motion to find draft number 4.1 of H.222 as amended favorable was made and seconded; the committee recorded an affirmative roll call. Members recorded as voting “yes” in the roll call reading in the transcript were: Dolan; Goldsign; Harvey; Allay; Oliver; Reese Smith; Jesse; and other members present. The motion outcome was recorded as approved. The mover and seconder were not identified by name on the record.

Implementation notes: committee staff instructed that the edited version of the bill be circulated for processing. A committee speaker asked that staff (referred to by name in the transcript) obtain the final edited version and send it forward.

Why it matters: the changes put a recurring reporting obligation on the state body that reviews domestic-violence fatalities and adds statutory remedies and program options that committee members said will let the state monitor how noncriminal accountability and survivor supports perform before considering further statutory penalties.

Next steps: committee members did not adopt additional substantive changes at the hearing. Staff were directed to circulate the edited version and move the bill through standard processing.