Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Congratulatory Resolution topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances resolution congratulating Donald J. Trump despite opposition

2608053 · March 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 3,019, a resolution congratulating Donald J. Trump on his inauguration, received a committee do-pass recommendation after debate; one senator voted no and public testimony included both support and opposition.

The Workforce Development Committee recorded a do-pass recommendation for House Concurrent Resolution 3,019, a congratulatory resolution for Donald J. Trump introduced by Representative Dawson Hawley.

Dawson Hawley opened the hearing by describing Trump’s 2024 performance in North Dakota and urging committee support for the symbolic resolution. "I respectfully ask for you to support a house concurrent resolution 30 19," Hawley told the committee.

The resolution drew both supportive and critical testimony. Andrew Alexis Farvel testified in opposition and urged lawmakers to reject the measure. "Please say no to house concurrent resolution 30 19," Farvel said, arguing the resolution would be divisive and likening it to "spiking the ball in the end zone." He went on to criticize aspects of the federal administration and warned the resolution would not promote unity.

Committee members discussed the appropriateness of a congratulatory resolution from a state legislature and whether it intersected with the committee’s jurisdiction. After debate a motion for a due-pass recommendation was moved and seconded. Roll-call votes recorded "Yes" from Senators Wabamah, Axeman, and Larson and Senator Powers; Senator Beauchetta recorded a "No" vote. With a majority voting yes, the committee recommended the resolution advance.

The measure is symbolic and does not change state policy; the committee comment noted the resolution reflects the political views of some North Dakotans and is intended as a formal statement from the Legislature rather than a legal or regulatory act.

The committee closed the hearing and will forward its recommendation through the usual legislative process.