Grand Junction council advances amended impact-fee ordinance after public hearing and months of study

Summary

City council voted 5-1 to publish an amended Title 21 ordinance on impact fees for a first reading, directing staff to use older lane-mile standards for transportation fees, set institutional fees on a church baseline, and phase in new rates over three years. The measure remains subject to final passage April 2 and further refinements.

City Council moved forward March 5 on revised rules for development impact fees that would raise charges for new residential and some nonresidential construction but phase increases in to ease the cost to builders and homebuyers.

Tamara Allen, the city’s community development director, presented the updated nexus study and draft ordinance, describing impact fees as “one time payments for growth related infrastructure. They're not a tax, but a contractual arrangement to build growth related infrastructure, and they must meet 3 kind of areas of law.” The council voted to publish the ordinance with staff-recommended changes and additional council direction, setting a second hearing for April 2.

Why it matters: the proposed changes would alter how Grand Junction recovers the cost of parks, police, fire and transportation improvements from new development. Staff and consultants said the updated calculations reflect current development patterns and construction costs; opponents said higher fees risk pricing first-time buyers and small projects out of the local market. Council adopted the changes for publication but left final approval to a future vote.

The staff recommendation retained parks, police, fire and transportation within the fee schedule but recommended not adopting municipal…

Grand Junction council advances amended impact-fee ordinance after public hearing and months of study

Summary

Subscribe to keep reading