Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pregnancy Lactation Employees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews employee pregnancy accommodations and Pregnant Workers protections
Summary
The committee discussed a draft employee policy aligning district practice with the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, Title VII and the ADA, clarifying who is covered and how to request accommodations; members asked staff to align terminology with student policy drafts.
The Communications & Policy Committee reviewed a draft personnel policy intended to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for pregnancy and related medical conditions and to reflect federal protections under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Karen Fisher Anderson walked the committee through the draft, noting it pulls legal references together: "This also brings in the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, regarding employment, pregnant employees, and employees with pregnancy related conditions," she said. The draft defines pregnancy broadly to include current, past and potential pregnancies and related conditions.
Board members questioned who qualifies as an "employee" for this policy. Fisher Anderson referenced state statute language used elsewhere and told the group that part- and full-time employees fall within the district's obligations; volunteers are excluded for lactation protections under the cited statute. Members also asked whether collective bargaining agreements would affect implementation; Fisher Anderson said payroll or contract provisions (for parental or other leave) remain controlled by existing agreements and that the policy is intended to be consistent with those contracts.
The committee discussed timing and notice provisions in the draft. The policy asks employees to notify the building principal, director of human resources or their supervisor in advance when feasible so the district can make accommodations without unnecessary delay. Karen Fisher Anderson told the committee the workplace standard in the draft calls for providing accommodation time without requiring employees to "make up the time."
Members suggested harmonizing terminology and definitions between the employee policy and the student policies (for example, use of the terms "accommodation" vs. "modification" and whether to say "nursing mothers" or "persons with lactation needs"). The committee directed staff to align definitions and to return the consolidated drafts to committee.
No formal vote was taken; the committee will consider the employee policy alongside the related student and lactation policies in a follow-up meeting and prepare clean copies for committee review.
