Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning & Zoning actions at a glance — March 12, 2025: plats, rezonings, appointments and UDC text amendment postponed
Summary
The Planning & Zoning Commission handled multiple plats, a pair of rezoning recommendations, appointments to advisory committees, and postponed a proposed UDC amendment. This roundup lists each formal action the commission took and immediate follow‑up items.
The Cibolo Planning and Zoning Commission on March 12 took formal action on multiple agenda items. Below is a concise list of motions, outcomes and immediate next steps. All items are recommendations to City Council unless noted otherwise.
Votes at a glance
- Approval of minutes (Agenda item 7A): Motion to approve minutes of the February 12, 2025 meeting — outcome: approved by the commission (recorded in minutes).
- Final Plat: Cibolo Farms Unit 3 (Agenda item 9A): Motion to recommend approval of final plat establishing 97 residential lots and associated open space — outcome: recommended for approval to City Council; staff conditions to be met in engineering review.
- Final Plat: Grace Valley Ranch Unit 3 Street Extension (Agenda item 9B): Staff reported outstanding technical comments; commission recommended denial pending corrections — outcome: denied (applicant may resubmit with corrections).
- Final Plat: Grace Valley Ranch Unit 3A (Agenda item 9C): Staff reported pending comments including clarification of parkland dedication; commission recommended denial — outcome: denied (resubmittal required).
- Preliminary Plat: Grace Valley Ranch Unit 3 (Agenda item 9D): Applicant requested a postponement to address staff comments — outcome: postponed at applicant’s request to the next meeting.
- Land Study: Neal Tract (Agenda item 9E): Commission recommended denial due to inconsistencies in the engineering report, incorrect EDU assumptions, and lack of mapped parkland dedication — outcome: denied; applicant advised to resubmit corrected materials.
- Rezoning — 248 West Borgfeld Road (Agenda item 9F; public hearing 8A): Motion to recommend rezoning from SF‑2 to neighborhood commercial (C‑1) for approximately 4.05 acres — outcome: recommended to City Council (motion passed by commission).
- Rezoning — South of Borgfeld/Dobie (Agenda item 9G; public hearing 8B): Applicant requested rezoning from SF‑2 to C‑2 for a 5.205‑acre parcel. After discussion the commission first considered and rejected a motion to recommend C‑2; the commission then voted to recommend C‑1 with a conditional‑use permit limited to a fitness studio/gym and compatible tenants (motion carried; recommendation to City Council). Applicant must submit site plan and traffic analysis for staff review.
- UDC Amendment — Article 20 (Agenda item 9H; public hearing 8C): Staff presented a draft amendment intended to streamline performance, maintenance and warranty bond procedures. The commission postponed action to the next meeting to allow commissioners additional review time and to collect comments.
- Appointments: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee / KAYAC (Agenda item 9I): The commission recommended appointment of a P&Z member (recommendation forwarded to council). The commission selected a nominee for consideration by council.
- Appointments: UDC Advisory Committee (UDCAC) (Agenda item 9J): The commission recommended two members to the UDC advisory committee; the names will be forwarded to City Council for appointment.
What happens next
These are recommendations to City Council and will appear on the council agenda for final action. Technical denials and postponements require resubmittal and clearance of engineering comments before an item returns to planning and zoning for reconsideration. Staff will coordinate required traffic studies, parking calculations and parkland documentation with applicants.
This summary is intended as a decision log for residents, applicants and staff; the full staff reports and recorded meeting minutes contain the detailed findings and legal references cited during the meeting.
