Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Decisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: board approves meeting agenda and consent agenda, including Apollo parking/parking lot and theater change order
Summary
The St. Cloud Public School District Board approved the March 12 meeting and consent agendas by voice votes, adopting routine items including personnel changes, financial reports and several facility and policy items.
The St. Cloud Public School District Board of Education approved the meeting agenda and the consent agenda on March 12 by voice vote.
A motion to approve the meeting and work session agenda was made by Scott Endreson and seconded by Natalie Copeland; the board voted in favor. A separate motion to approve the consent agenda was made by Scott Endreson with a second by Natalie Copeland and carried by recorded assent from board members present.
The consent agenda included these items (as read at the meeting): approval of personnel/staff changes; monthly financial report for Jan. 2025; monthly treasurer’s report for Jan. 2025; bid award for Apollo parking lot improvements; resolution appointing election judges; Apollo Theater improvements change order totaling $7,182; approval of revised board policy 5.35 (service animals in schools) — third reading; proposed revised board policy 5.27 (student use and parking of motor vehicles; patrols, inspections and searches) — minor legal reference change; and proposed revised board policy 5.29 (staff notifications of violent behavior by students) — minor legal reference change.
Motions and vote records captured on the transcript:
- Approve meeting and work session agenda: mover Scott Endreson; second Natalie Copeland; outcome: approved (board voice votes recorded as Yes by members present: Zach Dorholt, Diana Fenton, Shannon Hawes, Heather Weems, Scott Endreson, Natalie Copeland, Al Dahlgren).
- Approve consent agenda: mover Scott Endreson; second Natalie Copeland; outcome: approved (Yes votes recorded by the same members present as above).
No dissenting votes were recorded on the transcript for these motions. Items removed from the consent agenda were not reported during the meeting.
