Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chester County participants pledge to correct audit findings, cite $1.4 million fund-balance discrepancy
Summary
Officials and meeting participants discussed an audit report, steps to restore accurate financial records and budgeting, and coordination with auditors and state advisors; an actual fund balance of about $1.4 million was cited and restricted fund testing was raised.
Chester County meeting participants discussed recent audit findings and next steps to restore accurate financial records, saying they will work with auditors, state advisors and newly assigned staff to pursue a “clean audit.”
The discussion centered on restoring reliable budget and accounting procedures after meeting contributors cited gaps in data and reconciliations; speakers referred to excerpts of an 87-page audit report and said the county’s actual fund balance was about $1,400,000 while the budgeted number differed.
Why it matters: County fiscal decisions and timely budgeting depend on accurate financial statements. Officials said correcting recordkeeping and training staff are priorities before the next budget cycle.
Participants said they would coordinate with external auditors and the state advisory body, finalize the audit review and ask follow-up questions to clarify discrepancies. "We're committed to strive to get back to a clean audit," said Speaker 2, Commenter, reflecting the meeting's central pledge. Meeting remarks noted work with a new budget supervisor and training help from identified staff members.
During the meeting the mayor distributed and referenced parts of the audit report. Speaker 1, Staff member, discussed accounting procedures and fund testing and said auditors examine each county fund and separate restricted balances during their tests. "Yeah. And our actual fund balance was 1,400,000.0, but the the budgeting number is what that I, Bonnie, is referring to," Speaker 1 said while describing the difference between recorded and budgeted figures.
Participants thanked staff members named in the discussion for assisting with reconciliations and training, including references to "Miss Stacy" and "Miss Judy." They described prior difficulty obtaining timely data and emphasized a goal of producing accurate statements so commissioners can make sound decisions. Speakers said they want to be on time with the budget and to finalize outstanding audit questions before adopting the next budget.
The discussion also referenced a statutory or procedural citation spoken during the meeting as "Section 9 3 dash 4 5. All" and broader references to state policies and procedures governing county financial practices. No formal votes or motions were recorded in the transcript excerpts provided; the discussion was presented as an informational review and planning step toward correcting recordkeeping and improving monitoring.
Next steps mentioned in the meeting included finalizing the audit review, asking targeted questions of auditors, working with the state advisory group, continuing staff training and ensuring budgeting deadlines were met.
